Connect with us

Politics

General Michael Flynn “The Obama Kryptonite”

Published

on

The important details the media conspicuously leave out.

When last we left General Flynn our caped crusader in my previous article, he was at the precipice of a hideous judicial roadblock not scene in recent memory. What we will delve into here will be the small details that will color your perception of the Government vs Michael T. Flynn in a totally different hue. You grow weary night after night of listening to half truths and outright lies in the media. There is a definitively evil intent behind this type of reporting. Some of the reporters are multimillionaire graduates of ivy league schools. They are definitely educated and know exactly of what they speak. Purposeful omission is the same as a willful lie.

In 2014 General Michael T. Flynn was the Director of Intelligence for the Obama administration. He testified before congress on security issues under the Obama administration and soon after was unceremoniously fired. Mike Flynn disagreed with the administration on a host of issues and one was the ascension of ISIS. The Iran deal was another point of friction. Flynn had the inside scoop on the outright lies the administration used to cover up The Benghazi tragedy. Benghazi was a planned terror attack they blamed on an obscure video that to this date not many have seen, but to add insult to injury in pushing their video narrative they arranged a 70 thousand dollar taxpayer funded video decrying negative islamophobic portrayal in the media. Then arresting the innocent maker of the video to complete the Hollywood ending. CIA director John Brennan was funding official government operations off the books to the tune of billions of dollars, sometimes involving shady foreign financiers. General Flynn was going to audit the intelligence agencies as well as restructure them and spill the beans on all illegal and unethical activities. Before all of this could happen he was fired!

Low and behold after Obama fires Flynn to quell the mutiny, soon after, Flynn is hired by the incoming Trump administration after the warning of Obama to Trump that Flynn was bad news. So you can imagine the utter panic the Obama officials felt when they saw General Flynn entering and exiting Trump tower during the transition. So Flynn was immediately targeted, Public Enemy #1 on the Obama Most Wanted list. So this lays out the motive.

To dispel some rumors that Flynn lied, FBI agents Pientka and Strzok said initially they thought Flynn was being truthful in the unscrupulous Whitehouse interview. The original 302 FBI notes from that interview have gone missing or fishing. How could the worlds premiere law enforcement agency lose the notes on a case of this magnitude, unless it was on purpose? The transcript or audio of the phone call was never reviewed by Flynn’s legal team to actually show where exactly they thought Flynn lied. Yes he lied but we are not going to show it to you. It’s probably because he did not lie. The agents initially said he didn’t lie and nowhere in any records does it speak of sanctions in which they said he spoke or lied about. General Flynn speaking with his Russian counter-part about sanctions are perfectly legal so why would he lie about something legal and he knows the call was being monitored? Also he spoke with approximately 30 countries in a 24 hour period while on vacation in the Dominican Republic. So it suffices to say he may not remember every little exact detail. This is the discrepancy with Mike Pence. General Flynn could not remember exactly what was said on all of those phone calls and the FBI said he illegally talked about sanctions which was not illegal and the evidence of that has not shown up yet.

FARA the Foreign Agents Registration Act. They also hid a small connection in the fine print of Flynn’s Turkish company that may have some minor contact to Russia, so when Flynn says he does not work for the Russians they can say he lied. They also said Flynn was guilty of not filing his FARA paperwork correctly. This is a crock! There is never usually harsh punishment for FARA violations. The Podestas with whom Paul Manafort Trumps brief campaign advisor worked for, along with the DNC, Hillary Clinton and many other politicians had FARA violations. The Podesta brothers John and Tony are free as a bird FARA violations and all. Slap on the wrist and don’t pass go. A FARA violation is like a speeding ticket. Pay your fine, retroactively file your paperwork and move on. Obama brought up the LOGAN ACT. This states a civilian can not make policy with a foreign government without express consent from the current administration. Flynn was working for the administration doing his job. So the never used in our history LOGAN ACT would not apply. So you see they were desperate to dig up dirt on Flynn, and were coming up empty everytime. Obama had everyone in his administration listening and combing through Flynn’s calls to dig up dirt. So to the point Flynn was being targeted and spied on he never did anything wrong or against the law. The prosecution also threatened Flynn’s son with prosecution after Flynn endured 2 million dollars in legal fees having to sell his house, he plead guilty. Facing bankruptcy and an incoming attack on his family Flynn plead guilty. How many media sites and broadcasts would give you all of this information? Stay tuned, News@11

 

By Michael Ameer

 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/208142449894990

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

President Donald Trump 45 – 47

Published

on

Donald Trump’s political journey over the last eight years has been a vivid illustration of modern populism, defying conventional political odds. Starting with his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump, a real estate mogul and reality TV star, harnessed populist sentiments to propel his candidacy. His message resonated with many Americans feeling left behind by globalization and economic shifts, promising to restore jobs, combat what he described as unfair trade deals, and prioritize American interests over international cooperation. This populist wave was marked by his direct communication style, bypassing traditional media to connect with voters through rallies and social media, where he spoke of “draining the swamp” in Washington, suggesting a deep-seated distrust in the political establishment.

The struggle of Trump supporters has mirrored this populist movement, characterized by a sense of alienation from what they perceive as a detached political and cultural elite. This group, often labeled pejoratively by some in the mainstream, found in Trump a voice for their frustrations with immigration policies, economic policies favoring global trade over local jobs, and cultural shifts they felt were imposed without their consent. The Trump family, from Melania’s fashion choices to Ivanka’s political involvement, became symbols of this populist resistance against the perceived elitism of politics. The criticism they faced only deepened the solidarity among Trump’s supporters, who saw in his family a reflection of their own battles against the establishment.

The alt-media ecosystem was instrumental in this populist surge, serving as both a battleground and a bastion. Outlets like Breitbart and Infowars, and later platforms like Parler and Truth Social, became the echo chambers where Trump’s narrative of being a victim of political witch hunts and media bias was amplified. These platforms didn’t just report news; they crafted a narrative where Trump’s every move, from policy to personal tweets, was framed as part of a larger fight against a corrupt system. This interaction between Trump, his supporters, and the alt-media has redefined political discourse, showcasing how populism can harness media, both traditional and digital, to challenge and reshape political norms. Trump’s journey has thus not only defied odds but has also redefined what political success looks like in an era where populism can sway elections and influence policy discussions at the highest levels.

Continue Reading

Politics

President Trump Returns to Butler to FIGHT for America First

Published

on

Trump’s Return to Butler, PA: A Symbol of Tenacity and Defiance

Today, former President Donald Trump makes a symbolically charged return to Butler, Pennsylvania, the site where his resilience was tested in an unprecedented manner. This visit, on October 5, 2024, is not just another campaign stop but a poignant reminder of his enduring “FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT” mantra, which has become emblematic of his political persona.

A Historical Backdrop

On July 13, 2024, Butler was thrust into the national spotlight when an assassination attempt was made on Trump during a rally. Surviving with a mere graze to his ear, Trump’s immediate response was to raise his fist, a moment captured in what has now become an iconic image, symbolizing his defiance against adversity. This incident didn’t just scar him physically but also galvanized his supporters, turning Butler into a shrine of sorts for Trump’s resilience.

The Symbolism of the Return

Trump’s decision to return to Butler is laden with symbolism. Here’s why this visit resonates deeply with his campaign ethos:

  1. Defiance in the Face of Danger: Returning to the site where his life was threatened underscores Trump’s narrative of not backing down. It’s a physical manifestation of his “FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT” ethos, showcasing his refusal to be intimidated by violence or political opposition.
  2. Political Theatre and Momentum: This rally serves as a masterstroke in political theatre, aiming to convert the attempt on his life into a rallying cry for his supporters. It’s an attempt to reignite the fervor seen in the immediate aftermath of the incident, where his campaign saw a surge in support, portraying him as a fighter against all odds.
  3. Uniting the Base: By revisiting Butler, Trump not only honors the victims of the incident but also uses the location to unify his base. The rally is expected to be a blend of remembrance and a call to action, emphasizing themes of perseverance, security, and defiance against the establishment’s perceived failures.
  4. A Message of Strength: For Trump, every appearance since the assassination attempt has been an opportunity to project strength. Returning to Butler amplifies this message, suggesting that neither personal attacks nor political challenges will deter his campaign or his message.

The Broader Impact

The “FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT” mantra has transcended its initial context, becoming a broader call against what Trump describes as systemic failures, from immigration policies to disaster response, as seen in his critiques of the current administration’s handling of events in North Carolina, echoed in his and his allies’ posts on X.

This return to Butler isn’t just about revisiting the site of a traumatic event; it’s a strategic move to encapsulate his campaign’s spirit in one location, making it a pilgrimage of sorts for his supporters. It represents Trump not just as a politician but as a symbol of resistance and persistence, key themes in his narrative of reclaiming America.

In sum, Trump’s rally in Butler today is more than a campaign event; it’s a testament to his campaign’s core message: a relentless fight against adversaries, be they political opponents, critics, or even those who threaten his life. This event is poised to be a significant moment in the 2024 presidential race, leveraging trauma, resilience, and defiance into political capital.

Continue Reading

Politics

The Clash of Titans: X’s Shutdown in Brazil

Published

on

In an unprecedented move, Brazil’s Supreme Court has ordered the nationwide suspension of X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing feud between the platform’s owner, Elon Musk, and Brazilian authorities. This decision stems from Musk’s refusal to comply with court orders to appoint a legal representative in Brazil and to suspend certain accounts accused of spreading misinformation and hate speech.

The tension reached a boiling point when Justice Alexandre de Moraes gave X a 24-hour ultimatum to name a representative or face a complete operational shutdown in Brazil. Musk’s response was to close X’s office in Brazil, citing threats of arrest against his staff for non-compliance with what he described as “secret censoring orders.” This move has left millions of Brazilian users in the dark, with the platform going offline across the nation.

The implications of this standoff are manifold. Firstly, it pits the concept of free speech, as championed by Musk, against Brazil’s judicial efforts to curb what it sees as the spread of dangerous misinformation. Critics argue that this is a test case for how far nations can go in regulating global digital platforms. Secondly, the economic impact on X cannot be understated, with Brazil being one of its significant markets.

The situation has also sparked a debate on digital sovereignty versus global internet freedom. While some see Justice de Moraes’s actions as necessary to protect Brazilian democracy, others view it as an overreach, potentially stifling free expression. As X users in Brazil scramble to find alternatives or use VPNs to bypass the ban, the world watches closely to see if this could set a precedent for other nations grappling with similar issues.

Continue Reading

Trending

Donate to Populist Wire

*Note: Every donation is greatly appreciated, regardless of the amount.