Iowa
Rob Sand BUSTS Iowa Police Chief – “Got Um”
In the rolling farmlands of central Iowa, where community trust is the glue holding small towns together, a routine financial review has exposed a web of overpayments and oversight lapses that cost taxpayers nearly $90,000. On Thursday, November 6, Iowa State Auditor Rob Sand released a scathing special investigation into the City of Baxter, revealing improper disbursements tied to three former officials—including William Daggett, who resigned that same morning as Mitchellville’s police chief. What began as whispers of padded timesheets in a town of just 1,000 residents has rippled outward, forcing a leadership vacuum in neighboring Mitchellville and igniting debates on accountability in rural governance.
Daggett’s swift exit—submitted hours after the report dropped—underscores the fragility of public service in Iowa’s heartland. Hired by Mitchellville in March 2024 after leaving Baxter amid internal scrutiny, the 20-year law enforcement veteran now faces not just reputational ruin but potential criminal probes. As Jasper County authorities and the Iowa Attorney General’s Office review the findings, this scandal serves as a cautionary tale: In places where officials wear multiple hats, the line between diligence and deceit can blur with devastating consequences.
The Unraveling in Baxter: A New Council’s Wake-Up Call
It was a crisp January morning in 2024 when Baxter’s freshly elected city council, buoyed by a wave of local change, cracked open the ledgers of their modest municipal operation. The town, nestled in Jasper County with its single stoplight and volunteer fire department, had long operated on faith in its core team: Police Chief William Daggett, who juggled patrols with a side gig in Van Meter; City Clerk Katie Wilson, the gatekeeper of the books; and EMS Coordinator Randi Gliem, coordinating life-saving responses. But as the new officials pored over payroll stubs and credit card statements, the numbers didn’t add up—timesheets bloated with hours unverified by dispatch logs, vacation payouts exceeding earned balances, and Visa charges for items that vanished from city inventories.
By early February, an internal probe had escalated into a full-blown crisis. Gliem resigned on the 5th, citing personal reasons but skipping a pivotal review meeting. Ten days later, Wilson and Daggett followed, their departures leaving Baxter’s public safety apparatus in disarray. The council, acting on mounting suspicions, fired off a “qualifying request” to Sand’s office—a taxpayer-funded mechanism designed to unearth fiscal foul play. What they uncovered wasn’t just sloppy bookkeeping; it was a pattern of excess that drained public coffers, from overlapping shifts that let Daggett collect dual paychecks to undocumented swipes at big-box stores. As one anonymous council member told local reporters, “We trusted them to protect us, not pick our pockets.”
Daggett’s Quick Pivot: Hope in Mitchellville Turns Sour
Undeterred by the Baxter fallout, Daggett polished his resume and landed the chief’s role in Mitchellville by March 4—a town of 2,300 with ambitions to bolster its force amid growing suburban sprawl from Des Moines. Elected officials there saw a seasoned operator: Daggett’s bio touted decades on the beat, from traffic stops to crisis negotiations. Yet red flags lingered. Mitchellville’s human resources team, spotting echoes of Baxter’s payroll puzzles in Daggett’s timesheets, quietly requested their own state audit in the spring. “We hire for integrity,” Mayor Scott Meeker said in a statement Friday, “and when questions arise, we act decisively.”
The move proved prescient. As Sand’s team dug into Baxter’s records—cross-referencing timesheets against Jasper County Sheriff’s call-in logs and employment overlaps—the discrepancies piled up. Daggett’s claimed full shifts often coincided with zero check-ins, suggesting ghost hours billed while he worked elsewhere. By summer, whispers in Mitchellville’s city hall grew louder, with staffers trading notes on unapproved comp time accruals. The audit’s release on Thursday morning hit like a siren: Daggett’s resignation letter arrived before noon, accepted provisionally by Meeker pending a council vote next week. In its wake, the department’s 12 officers are left leaderless, with a veteran sergeant stepping in as interim chief.
Audit Deep Dive: The Numbers That Don’t Lie
Sand’s 40-page report, spanning July 2021 to February 2024, paints a damning portrait of lax controls in Baxter’s $1.2 million annual budget. At the epicenter: $51,275.62 in overpayments to Daggett alone, broken down into excess wages ($41,944.77 from 36 unverified pay periods), comp time payouts ($6,667.33 for 161 ineligible hours), and duplicate billing ($2,663.52 for 65 hours claimed across two full-time jobs). Wilson netted $3,509.55 in improper comp time, inflated by mathematical errors and leave-period earnings, while Gliem pocketed $1,461.09 via overtime misclassifications and phantom EMS shifts. Add $1,776.99 in volunteer payroll irregularities, and payroll alone siphoned $58,023 from the till.
Beyond wages, the probe flagged $11,294.57 in unsupported expenditures—credit card splurges at Amazon and Target without receipts, totaling $5,932.32, plus vendor checks for groceries and gear that never reached city shelves. Another $15,035.90 went to questionable vendors, including $4,050 overpaid to a uncertified water operator. Late fees tacked on $129.81, and utility bungles left $3,814.88 uncollected in penalties and deposits. “These weren’t isolated slips,” Sand said at a Des Moines presser. “They point to systemic failures—no reviews, no segregation of duties, just trust without verification.” The auditor referred the file to prosecutors, hinting at theft or forgery charges under Iowa Code.
Legal Implications for the Individuals Involved
By Billy Dewayne Fraizer IV, Billy D. Frazier IV – Senior Judicial Legal Analyst (Iowa / National)
Auditor’s Findings and Context (Opinion): The Baxter audit exposes a breach of fiduciary duty—officials mishandled public funds by failing to verify hours and purchases. Under Iowa Code § 721.2(5), that could amount to “Misconduct in Office.” It shows how trust alone cannot replace documented accountability in small-town government. Layman’s terms: They were supposed to take care of taxpayers’ money, but they didn’t double-check what was being spent. That’s not just sloppy—it could be a crime when public cash is handled carelessly.
The Numbers That Don’t Lie (Opinion): With $51,275.62 in overpayments to one officer, the losses exceed felony thresholds under Iowa theft statutes if intent is proven. Citizens are owed restitution and deterrence; repayment alone cannot close the case. Layman’s terms: That’s a lot of money—enough to count as a felony if he meant to do it. Paying it back isn’t the same as facing justice; taxpayers deserve both accountability and prevention.
Fallout and Voices: Resignation, Reckoning, and Repercussions
The shockwaves reached Mitchellville’s council chambers by evening, where members huddled to appoint an interim and launch a national search for Daggett’s replacement. “This is a blow, but we’re committed to transparency,” Meeker told KCCI, emphasizing the city’s parallel audit request as proactive governance. Daggett, reached briefly outside his home, declined comment, but sources close to him say he’s cooperating fully and disputes the audit’s characterizations as “overreach on incomplete logs.”
Sand, a Democrat wrapping up his term amid re-election buzz, used the podium to rally local watchdogs. “Audits like this happen because someone speaks up,” he urged, noting the report’s reliance on the council’s tip. “Public trust is the real currency here—lose it, and reputations follow.” Indeed, the scandal has locals buzzing: Baxter’s Facebook groups brim with calls for repayment plans, while Mitchellville residents petition for ethics training. No charges have landed yet, but the shadow looms large over the ex-officials’ futures.
Lessons for Iowa’s Heartland: Beyond Baxter’s Borders
This isn’t Baxter’s anomaly; it’s a symptom of strains in Iowa’s 900-plus municipalities, where budgets scrape by on property taxes and part-time clerks double as bookkeepers. The report lambasts absent safeguards—no monthly bank reviews, no council sign-offs on payroll—echoing audits in Eldora and Correctionville that flushed out similar grift. Statewide, Sand’s office fields 50 such requests yearly, up 20% since 2020, as post-pandemic hiring booms expose weak spots.
Yet hope flickers in reform pushes: Bills in the Iowa Legislature aim to mandate annual internal audits for towns under 5,000 residents, with whistleblower bounties for tips leading to recoveries. “It’s about empowering the everyday Iowan,” says Sen. Rob Hogg, a Cedar Rapids Democrat sponsoring one measure. For now, Baxter’s council is overhauling policies—segregating duties, digitizing receipts—while Mitchellville eyes body cams for fiscal accountability, a cheeky nod to policing its own books.
Broader Judicial and National Perspectives
By Billy Dewayne Fraizer IV, Billy D. Frazier IV – Senior Judicial Legal Analyst (Iowa / National)
Daggett’s Resignation and Broader Impact (Opinion): Resigning the same day the audit dropped looks like consciousness of guilt—a signal he knew trouble was coming. Mitchellville may face exposure for negligent hiring if it ignored Baxter’s red flags, since public employers must vet applicants who handle taxpayer funds. Layman’s terms: Quitting right after the report makes it look like he knew he’d been caught. The next town that hired him might get in trouble too for not checking his background first.
Audit Corroboration and Resignation (Opinion): Cross-checking Baxter payrolls with Sheriff dispatch logs proved dual-employment conflicts and potential conversion of public funds. Daggett’s resignation before termination could be viewed as an attempt to preserve benefits or limit accountability. Layman’s terms: The audit showed he was clocked in two places at once—getting double-paid. Stepping down early might help him keep his pension, but it doesn’t erase what happened.
Outlook: Rebuilding Trust, One Ledger at a Time
As November’s chill settles over Iowa’s prairies, Baxter and Mitchellville stand at a crossroads. The cities could recoup some losses—Daggett already repaid $123.44 for minor items—but full restitution hinges on prosecutors’ grit. For Daggett, a return to private security seems likely; for Wilson and Gliem, quieter paths await. Sand’s report ends with a clarion call: “Fiduciary duty isn’t optional—it’s the oath of office.”
In the end, this saga reminds us that in America’s small towns, the badge of public service weighs heaviest when balanced against the ledger. As Baxter’s new clerk logs her first unblemished payroll, and Mitchellville’s interim chief radios in for duty, one truth endures: Accountability isn’t just good policy—it’s the patrol car keeping watch over us all.
*Disclaimer: The views expressed by Billy D. Frazier IV, Senior Judicial Legal Analyst (Pro Se), are for educational and public advocacy purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or attorney services. Mr. Frazier is not a licensed attorney and acts solely as a pro se litigant and public legal educator.*
I. Federal RICO Appeal (Frazier v. Jones, 8th Circuit)
“This was the setup. No kids were there. This is what they do to retaliate.”
After nearly a year of navigating Iowa’s judicial system, Billy Frazier’s federal case, Frazier v. Jones (1:25-cv-00033-CJW-MAR), has entered its next stage: appeal before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Frazier filed this civil RICO action alleging coordinated retaliation and corruption among judges, prosecutors, DHS, local police, and housing officials in Cedar Rapids. The case, originally accepted in the Northern District of Iowa, was dismissed without prejudice by Judge C.J. Williams on August 13, 2025, after a series of warnings and procedural hurdles.
The official dismissal was rooted in “deficiencies” in the complaint and cited multiple immunity doctrines — judicial, prosecutorial, public defender, and social worker — effectively shielding every government actor named.
What followed, however, raised alarms. Even after Frazier filed a third amended complaint and supporting motions, the court moved swiftly to deny all further filings post-dismissal, with Judge Williams preemptively barring reconsideration, stating:
“All further filings shall be treated as correspondence and will not be ruled on.”
Critics argue this behavior constituted judicial predetermination, and Will himself stated:
“They had already decided how this would end, no matter what evidence I gave them. That’s not due process — that’s a script.”
The appeal now sits before the Eighth Circuit, where Will is confident that his ADA protections as a self-represented litigant with documented mental health conditions will factor into the court’s review.
“This time I cited ADA. I didn’t know before that I was protected. But I am. That changes everything.”
II. Housing Retaliation Lawsuit (Frazier & Goodfellow v. Algers & Cedar Rapids Housing)
Running parallel to the RICO action is Frazier’s housing retaliation case filed in Linn County District Court alongside his disabled neighbor, Ms. Goodfellow. Both live in homes owned by the same landlord — and both claim they’ve faced escalating retaliation for speaking up about rent violations, HUD errors, and landlord misconduct.
Will’s story is personal:
“I’m Billy Frazier, a single Black father of four — including a 14‑month‑old baby — and the legal guardian who has protected and provided for my children for over a decade.”
After submitting FOIA requests and rent audits, Will discovered that mandatory 60‑day rent increase notices were never sent and that utility reimbursement checks were being mismanaged. Rather than fix the violations, housing officials and landlords allegedly retaliated:
- Ms. Goodfellow was named as a co-defendant in legal documents and subjected to eviction notices.
- Will’s home was targeted with sudden rent spikes, delayed repairs, and threats of removal from housing programs.
- Their case was assigned two overlapping docket numbers — CVCV108531 and CVCV108532 — which Will successfully fought to consolidate after alleging they were intended to create procedural confusion.
“This was done to overload my cognitive abilities and make me screw up procedurally.”
Now, the case proceeds under Judge Christopher Bruns, and Will has filed motions to:
- Dismiss improper law firm representation from landlords.
- Submit evidence of ongoing retaliation (including misrouted mail, delay tactics, and administrative interference).
- Affirm that his co-plaintiff is fully aligned and impacted by the proceedings.
III. Jail & Retaliation (OWI Sentence and Federal Rights)
Frazier was sentenced to four days in jail for a first-offense OWI — double the normal sentence — which he claims was retaliatory for naming Judge Casey Jones after he started to expose the misconduct in the OWCR154106 case and his ties to being his lawyer in the 2007 gun case.
“He gave me four days when everyone else gets two. That’s his version of punishment without making it obvious.”
He gave Will alternatives to do community service but due to being a single father with a baby and full time job it wasn’t possible. He must now serve his remaining two days on November 8–9, 2025.
The OWI itself — which he calls fabricated — became a gateway for further abuse:
- DHS was contacted despite no children being present.
- A flash drive with overwhelming evidence of misconduct tampering with evidence and perjury was allegedly deleted during proceedings involving Judge Fisher — now recused from his housing case.
“It’s not just a mistake — it’s systemic. They use the same playbook. Arrest, threaten, overload, erase the record.”
He has submitted his Iowa Supreme Court appeal brief on the OWI conviction, now under review.
IV. New Threat: Retaliation by Eviction Notice
The most recent development ties directly into the housing retaliation narrative — and the timing is hard to ignore.
On October 29, 2025, attorneys representing landlords Rick and Beth Alger filed a resistance to Frazier’s Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) request, arguing there was no eviction in progress and that no 3‑day notice or FED action (Forcible Entry and Detainer) had been filed.
Just five days later, on November 3, 2025, those same landlords — Rick and Beth Alger — posted a 3‑Day Notice to Quit on the front door of Frazier’s home at 3316 Oakland Road NE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
“They told the judge there was no eviction. Then tried to evict me hours later.”
— Will Frazier
The notice demands that Will and his family vacate within three business days under Iowa Code §648.3, citing lease termination from October 31, 2025 and referencing a prior 30‑day notice issued August 28, 2025.
This new filing directly undercuts the defense’s claim that “no eviction” was underway and may serve as critical proof of retaliation-in-progress in both state and federal filings.
“They resisted the TRO saying no FED or 3‑day notice had been filed — then five days later, here it is on my door. It’s coordinated retaliation.”
— Will Frazier
Housing Retaliation Timeline
“They said no eviction was coming… then four days later they slapped a 3-Day Notice on my door. It was a setup.” – Will Frazier
- June 2, 2025: Will files a formal complaint with Cedar Rapids Housing Services regarding suspicious rent increases and missing utility reimbursement checks. He alleges the $175 rent increase matched his usual monthly utility reimbursement — making it appear that the funds were essentially being stripped.
- Mid-June 2025: A FOIA request response from Cedar Rapids Housing confirms that no federally required 60-day notice was on file for the rent increase. This violates HUD guidelines, confirming the retaliatory nature of the hike.
- Summer 2025: In an attempt to resolve the issue pre-litigation, Will enters settlement talks with the Algers. The landlord initially agrees to install mini-split AC units in his home — then backs out without explanation.
- September 28, 2025: Will files a formal complaint with HUD (Des Moines office), escalating the housing retaliation to the federal level.
- October 31, 2025: The Algers post a Notice to Vacate on both Will’s and his neighbor’s doors — one month after the HUD complaint. This triggers eviction fears for both families, who are Section 8 recipients.
- Late October 2025: Will files a civil suit in Linn County against the Algers and Cedar Rapids Housing, requesting a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to block any housing retaliation.
- October 29, 2025: The landlords’ attorney resists the TRO, stating they had not yet filed a 3-Day Notice or a Forcible Entry and Detainer (FED) lawsuit, thus arguing the TRO was “unnecessary.”
November 3, 2025: The Algers serve Will with a 3-Day Notice to Quit — just days after their TRO resistance. This move contradicts their previous legal claim and appears to directly follow the denied court intervention.
A Linn County juvenile case is raising alarms over how Iowa’s child welfare system treats sibling rights and judicial impartiality. At the center is Kristin Mitchell, who regained custody of two of her younger children in 2025 and is now fighting to keep them connected with their brother, WG, who remains in state custody.
Mitchell says WG was adopted through Iowa DHS into an abusive home, and that both she and her son disclosed the abuse in 2022. Their warnings were ignored, and her visits were cut off. WG was later removed from that adoptive home and placed back in DHS custody. Her daughter, however, remains under the custodial care of an adult living in the same household where WG was removed, raising further questions about oversight and child safety.
The dispute deepened when DHS first issued Mitchell a Family Notice in June 2025 — a legal recognition that she is a qualifying relative — then told the court she was not one. On August 11, a Linn County judge denied her motion to intervene in WG’s case, mischaracterizing her custody history and failing to address federal sibling-preservation law. Mitchell filed a motion to reconsider, highlighting the contradictions, statutory misreadings, and due process concerns, including evidence that the presiding judge and DHS staff viewed her private Facebook stories during deliberations.
Her filings also point to potential conflicts of interest: an attorney who once represented the father of her younger children now represents an adoptive mother opposing her position. And in a striking generational echo, the same DHS worker who handled Mitchell’s case as a child — which separated her from her siblings — is now assigned to WG’s case.
Mitchell argues that this case is not only about her family, but about whether Iowa DHS and Linn County courts will enforce the state and federal laws requiring sibling bonds to be preserved. “Hope is not a legal safeguard,” she wrote. Without intervention, she says, there is no enforceable mechanism to keep WG connected to his siblings.
Section I: RICO Case — New Escalations, New Evidence, Same Broken System
Since the last article, Billy D. Frazier IV’s RICO case has taken a sharp and highly publicized turn. What began as a local battle over due process and disability rights has evolved into a multi-pronged federal challenge — aimed squarely at corrupt state actors, retaliatory government agencies, and procedural manipulation by the Iowa judiciary.
In late August 2025, Frazier filed a new emergency motion in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, seeking an immediate restraining order and injunctive relief to block DHS and child support enforcement from launching new retaliatory actions mid-litigation. The motion documents:
• A fraudulent child support claim naming a non-father as the biological parent of Frazier’s child;
• A new child abuse assessment against the child’s mother, Brittany Taylor Dockery — just months after a similar case was closed;
• A broader pattern of proxy retaliation, false reporting, and administrative abuse tied to Will’s federal civil rights complaint;
• 17 years of documented state retaliation, escalating now as discovery looms.
“These actions lack any legal basis,” Frazier writes, “and constitute proxy retaliation against Plaintiff through his child and the child’s mother.”
Among the legal grounds cited are the First and Fourteenth Amendments, ADA protections, and the constitutional right to family integrity. But perhaps most importantly, Frazier is pushing to extend these protections to all co-parents and children connected to the case — a bold move that could pave the way for class-action-level impact.
He has also filed a Notice of Case Manipulation, preserving his appellate record and alleging coordinated interference by local agencies seeking to delay or sabotage pending motions. A screenshot from his official court filings, submitted via Iowa eFile, shows multiple new pleadings — all with detailed documentation of what Frazier calls “procedural ambush tactics.”
But new filings reveal something even deeper: evidence that Chief Judge C.J. Williams may have predetermined the outcome of the case — issuing rulings before documents were even filed.
⸻
Key Evidence: Ruling Issued Before Motion Was Filed
Will Frazier now presents clear procedural proof that Chief Judge C.J. Williams ruled against him before his filings even existed.
• The judge denied Motion to Amend (Doc. 96) at 8:23 AM on August 18, 2025.
• Frazier’s Fifth Motion to Amend (Doc. 101) wasn’t filed until 11:11 AM on August 20, 2025.
• A second filing, Pro Se Notice (Doc. 102), was submitted three minutes later at 11:14 AM.
Screenshots of PACER & NEF records confirm:
A motion was denied two days before it was even entered into the court system.
⸻
What This Means for the Case
The record shows more than just aggressive dismissal — it shows judicial predetermination and potential obstruction of a pro se litigant’s constitutional rights.
❌ Dismissed Before Fully Heard
The dismissal order included boilerplate language on judicial immunity, effectively shielding nearly all defendants from civil liability.
❌ Locked Out from Amendment
On August 18, Judge Williams denied any future amendments — even though none had been filed yet. This procedural lockout suggests that any future legal effort was already doomed.
❌ Live Filings Ignored
Despite filing a new amended complaint and notice on August 20, both documents appear to have been automatically disregarded.
⸻
Legal Argument Moving Forward
Will’s legal team — or Will himself, pro se — may argue that:
• The court pre-judged the outcome, violating due process.
• By denying motions before they were filed, the court refused to consider live filings on their merits.
• This establishes judicial bias and supports his broader RICO claim of systemic retaliation.
The case is now under appeal at the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, where these procedural irregularities may weigh heavily in determining whether the dismissal stands.
Section II: The Eviction Fight — A New Battlefront, A Call for Backup
While Will Frazier battles state retaliation in court through his RICO case, he now faces a devastating new front: housing displacement. Frazier and his family have been served with an October 31st lease termination — a move he says is direct retaliation for his activism, legal filings, and growing public visibility. His disabled neighbor, also a co-plaintiff in a separate lawsuit, has reportedly been targeted as well.
In a public post that quickly began circulating across Facebook, Will wrote:
CITIZENS ASSEMBLE — I NEED YOUR HELP
“To control the people, you control the housing. For too long, families have been silenced with the threat of retaliation. Too many have lost their homes just for speaking out. Too many have been crushed under retaliatory rent hikes while landlords ignored repairs and pocketed the profits.
This fight started with an OWI, but what they tried to bury has only grown. It’s now RICO. It’s in district court — back in the lion’s den, where corruption was exposed — and the battle has expanded into HOUSING. Retaliation, harassment, fraud, and abuse: it’s all coming out in discovery.”
Frazier also announced that he has filed a joint lawsuit with his family and his disabled neighbor, naming the landlords and housing authorities responsible for years of unsafe conditions and retaliatory behavior. The goal, he says, is not just justice for himself — but for every tenant who’s ever been silenced.
“If you’ve faced issues with HUD, Cedar Rapids Housing, or landlords like Rick & Beth Alger — reach out. Your voice matters. Now’s the time.”
Now facing the loss of housing, a custody threat tied to potential displacement, and barriers to relocating due to ADA status and housing voucher restrictions, Will has launched a GoFundMe campaign to rally public support:
He closes with a powerful call to collective action:
“This is bigger than me. It’s about breaking the system of retaliation and giving the people back their power.
Please keep this going. Share it. Talk about it. Don’t let them keep hiding behind the same tricks.”
Rob Sand BUSTS Iowa Police Chief – “Got Um”
RICO in Iowa: Eviction Retaliation
Fascism – The Projection of the Far Left!
RICO in America: Trump’s Relentless Pursuit of George Soros and the Dawn of Political Racketeering Prosecutions
