Connect with us

Business

Highest And Lowest Rent In America For 2017

Published

on

(Via Zerohedge)


Politically, culturally, and ecologically, 2017 was a year of anxiety. Hurricanes and flooding ravaged the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and Texas. Political controversies dominated headlines and push-notifications. Relations with North Korea reached their lowest point in decades, raising fears of a nuclear standoff.

Economically, though, things remained stable in 2017. The economy continued to recover from the market crash of 2008, with unemployment reaching its lowest point in 17 years. Although homeownership is rebounding from its nadir last decade, renting now far outpaces ownership. According to a new report by the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, renting households have been steadily rising since 2004, with 2017 marking the first slight decline in those 13 years. As of the middle of 2017, the JCHS estimates that there are about 43 million renters in the U.S. — more than a third of U.S. householders.

In an effort to give renters (and potential renters) market information in close to real time, ABODO releases monthly reports on rental trends throughout the year. Our Annual Rent Report is a more zoomed-out look at the year in renting. How did rent prices change nationally? At the state level? Where did rent increase the most over 2016, and where did it decline? Where are the 10 most expensive rental markets? Let’s start with a look at what happened nationwide.

Median Rent Nationwide

Nationally, rents were on the rise over the course of 2017. The national median rent for one-bedrooms rose 2.4%, ending the year at $1,040. Rents for two-bedroom apartments were $1,252 in December, 3% higher than they were in January.

But it didn’t always look like we were headed for an increase. One-bedroom median rents fell for much of the first quarter, and through June they were within 1.5 percentage points of January’s figure. In July, the median one-bedroom rent was $1,016 — exactly what it was in January. But the fall saw marked increases. The year’s most volatile months were October, November, and December, which saw the median rent increasing far more quickly than at any other time.

Two-bedroom rents exhibited similar stability through the first quarter before more sharp increases in the second. After a pause in the late summer and early Autumn, two-bedroom rents, like one-bedroom rents, saw their greatest hikes in the last three months of the year.

Rent by State

Rent went up in 28 states last year, as well as the District of Columbia. It decreased in 21 states, and stayed the same in just one: South Dakota.

The states where rent fell most were Connecticut, where rent fell an average of 3.8% per month, Washington (-1.3%), and New Mexico (-1.1%). The states with the highest average rental hikes were Rhode Island, where rents rose an average of 7.8% per month, West Virginia (5.3%), and Wyoming (5.1%).

Honolulu, HI, and Seattle, WA — two rental markets known for their volatile prices — also make our top five for greatest average monthly change, up an average of 2.4% and 2.1% each month, respectively.

The greatest average decreases month to month were much smaller than increases across the board, but the largest average monthly decrease went to Fort Wayne, IN, dropping an average of 2.8% monthly. Lincoln, NE (-2.2%); El Paso, TX (-1.9%); Pittsburgh, PA (-1.7%), St. Paul, MN (-1.7%); and Nashville, TN (-1.6%) also had sizable decreases.

2-Bedroom Apartments

Notably, Fort Wayne, IN, holds its place for largest average monthly decrease for two-bedroom apartments, with an average monthly change of -2.8%. Six other cities also maintain a spot in our top 10 decreases: El Paso, TX (-1.6%); Pittsburgh, PA (-1.3%); Buffalo, NY (-2.1%); St. Paul, MN (-.8%); and Columbus, GA (-.9%). The most surprising city on the list is San Francisco, CA — continually labeled as the most expensive rental market in the country. Nonetheless, two-bedroom rents there dropped an average of .9% a month.

The composition of our top 10 average monthly two-bedroom rent increases also remains very similar to list for one-bedroom increases, although these increases are markedly less steep. New Orleans, LA, drops to #7, with an average increase of 1.4%, while Washington, D.C. takes its place at #1, with an average increase of 2.6%. Atlanta, GA, comes in at #2 with 2.3%, and Seattle, WA, holds its #4 slot with 1.7%, tied with the rate of Minneapolis, MN, apartments. Sacramento, CA crawls up the list from #10 to #8, with an increase of 1.3%.

Miami, FL (2.1%); Winston-Salem, NC (1.5%); Phoenix, AZ (1.2%); and Kansas City, MO (1.2%) also saw their two-bedroom rents increase at some of the highest average monthly rates in the country. Meanwhile, two-bedroom apartments in Milwaukee, WI; Lubbock, TX; and Anchorage, AK, saw almost no rent change at all.

Highest & Lowest Rents in the Country

Coming in at an average monthly rent of $4,373, San Francisco, CA, continues to hold the nation’s highest price for a one-bedroom apartment by a margin of more than $1,000. And San Francisco’s rents actually decreased this year by an average of .9% each month.

New York City, NY, comes in second, with one-bedroom apartments going for $3,234, which also saw small average monthly decreases of .3%. NYC is followed closely by Los Angeles, CA ($3,099), and Washington, D.C ($3,031), both of which saw rises throughout the year.

Renters in Detroit, MI, enjoyed the lowest average monthly rent of the year: $613 for a one-bedroom. That’s one-seventh the cost of a one-bedroom in San Francisco. At just a dollar more, Fort Wayne, IN, has the nation’s second-cheapest rent, after topping our lists for largest rent average monthly decreases for both one- and two-bedrooms.

Lubbock, TX, pulled off an interesting feat, landing at #7 for cheapest one-bedroom rents with an average monthly change of nothing whatsoever. There’s something to be said for stable rents.

January 2018 Rent: New Year, New Trends?

With the recent JHCS report predicting that the past decade of rapid growth in renting households might be coming to an end, we might be on the cusp of an new rental landscape. In 2017, we saw about eight months of slow declines in rent prices, followed by four months of increases that more than made up for the early year rent drops. What does 2018 have in store?

Nationwide, 2018 starts with slightly higher rents for both one- and two-bedroom apartments: The national median one-bedroom rent is $1,046, a .58% increase over December, while two-bedroom rents saw only a negligible .17% increase to $1,152.

1-Bedroom January Rents

To make sure we’re including accurate data for as many cities as possible, we’re expanding our 2018 reports to include nearly 20 more cities. We’ve also dropped a few cities that no longer match our parameters for minimum population and property count thresholds. (For more detail, visit our methodology section.)

One of the newcomers to our study tops this month’s list of highest one-bedroom rent hikes for January: Syracuse, NY, with a jump of 8.8%. Washington, D.C., is a distant second-place, with rents up 5.5% to $2,453. The nation’s capital is closely by St. Petersburg, FL (5.4%), and St. Paul, MN (5.1%) — which was also #3 for December rent increases. Phoenix, AZ, is another repeat on the list, with a 3.2% increase in one-bedroom rents, following a 2.6% rise in our December report.

Three Texas cities saw rents go up at least 2%: Richardson leads the Lone Star state with a 3.2% increase to $1,236, followed by Fort Worth (up 3% to $930), and Houston (up 2.2% to $1,057).

Our top two cities for greatest median one-bedroom rent decreases are also new to our studies: Little Rock, AR (-12.2%), and New Haven, CT (-9.1%). Those newcomers push last month’s top two down to #3 and #5: Columbus, OH (-7.4%), and Madison, WI (-4.9%), respectively.

Two other Ohio cities also saw significant decreases in January. One-bedroom rents in Cincinnati are down 3.9%, to $824, and Cleveland’s are down 3.2%, to $777.

2-Bedroom January Rents

In many cases, two-bedroom rents are following suit with one-bedroom fluctuations. St. Paul, MN, saw the highest increase, up 9.5% to $1,501, with St. Petersburg, FL, close behind with rents up 9.2% to $1,485.

Fort Worth, TX (4.5%); Richardson, TX (4.1%); Denver, CO (2.8%); and Syracuse, NY (2.5%), are all also carry-overs from our list of highest one-bedroom rent hikes. Rent increases in Boulder, CO (5.1%); Las Vegas, NV (4.8%); Gainesville, FL (3.1%); and Evansville, IN (2.9%) outpaced their one-bedroom counterparts.

Two-bedroom rent decreases, however, seem to go their own way. Our largest decrease of 6.4% goes to Fargo, ND, where two-bedroom rents are now $790. New Orleans, LA — which lead 2017 for highest average monthly increases — gets a bit of relief, with two-bedroom rents down 6.1%.

Three typically expensive cities saw breaks for their two-bedroom renters: Berkeley, CA, saw prices dip 5.3%, while Atlanta, GA, and Seattle, WA, saw drops of 3.3% and 3.2%, respectively.

Cleveland, OH (-4.8%); Little Rock, AK (-3.6%); and New Haven, CT (-38%), are the only cities that repeat from the one-bedroom list.

So far, national rent trends paint a mild picture going into 2018. We’ll keep an eye on the trends, and report back next month.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Enjoy Your Tasty Wheat: How AI Corporate Greed is Killing Humanity

Published

on

Why the elite have decided it’s better to feed machines than humans.

We have a lower class of CEOs. And AI is making it worse.

In the past, these titans of industry would invest in their communities: libraries, public works projects, parks, or actual philanthropy.

Today’s C-suite “geniuses” engage in fake activism, bribery disguised as donations, and a complete nihilism from the communities they proclaim to serve at the safety of their gated communities.

It used to be a source of great pride for an owner to discuss how many employees they have. They would boast about how they put food on the table for families. They would talks about benefits, and how well they take care of their workers. Hell, they used to even describe them as “family.”

Now, they can’t wait to tell shareholders how they automate everything themselves, outsource to foreign countries for pennies on the dollar, and utilize AI to cut their entire labor force (we will get to this soon.)

The common thread is that those at the top are completely divorced from their workforce, the very people that happen to also be their consumers.

This was the situation largely even before AI. It’s gotten worse. They are absolutely foaming at the mouth to displace workers.

The only way to describe it is a race to the bottom. Investing millions into replacing humans with AI. This is already happening, and the reward has been big short-term gains from cutting jobs that look like more profitability to investors.

What’s more is that these AI data centers need billions of gallons of water, insane amounts of electricity, and tons of facilities to expand growth. It’s so astronomical they’re talking about moving it into space.

Think about it for a minute: companies would rather provide “drinking” water, “feed” electricity, and pay to “house” MACHINES instead of paying a living wage to people.

In fact, it might even be cheaper to pay a living wage. That isn’t stopping industry leaders from chasing their human-less dreams, despite it taking less energy and resources for humans. Yet they’re still choosing machines.

They are even willing to operate at a loss simply for the idea that they can save the cost of paying a wage.

There are a few outcomes that are possible:

Best case: AI hype is exposed as overblown and companies understand that it’s simply a tool and they need actual operators behind the steering wheel. AI starts creating more jobs. It seems unlikely, but given that AI in actuality produces more slop than creative, it’s possible.

Worst Case: The arms race of displacing workers continues. Their greed hasn’t ever really showed signs of waning. To supplement the slop it creates, they will use freelance labor from countries like India to extinguish the fires it creates and justify not needing a full time employee. They will stop at nothing to chase their goal of a technocracy to increase profits. (Note: They think they don’t need you to even buy their products with the top 1% buying 50% of the goods.)

They trained AI on your work, fired you to save money, flooded the world with soulless garbage, empty warehouses, and call it innovation.

To them I say: enjoy your tasty wheat.

Continue Reading

Business

MAGA: From Shopping Mall to Manufacturing Hub 2.0

Published

on

Title: America’s Transition: From Shopping Mall to Manufacturing Hub 2.0

In the past few decades, America has often been described metaphorically as a giant shopping mall or auction house, where consumption and commercialism have dominated the landscape. However, with the rise of the Trump administration and the ambition to “Make America Great Again,” a new vision is emerging—one that aims to transform the nation into the world’s greatest manufacturing hub ever seen, leveraging AI, blue-collar labor, and a combination of innovative technologies.

The shift from a consumer-driven economy to a production powerhouse signifies a strategic move towards self-sufficiency, economic resilience, and global competitiveness. This transformation is not merely about revitalizing industries of the past but embracing cutting-edge technologies and sustainable practices to redefine the future of manufacturing.

At the heart of this evolution lies the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into manufacturing processes. AI-driven automation streamlines production, enhances efficiency, and reduces costs, enabling American manufacturers to compete on a global scale. By harnessing the power of machine learning and predictive analytics, businesses can optimize supply chains, minimize waste, and customize products to meet diverse consumer demands.

However, the vision for America’s manufacturing renaissance extends beyond technological innovation. It embraces a diverse workforce, blending the traditional blue-collar skillset with the expertise of engineers, data scientists, and software developers. This fusion of talent creates a dynamic ecosystem where creativity, problem-solving, and collaboration drive continuous improvement and sustainable growth.

Moreover, the resurgence of American manufacturing is not confined to a single sector but encompasses a broad spectrum of industries, from automotive and aerospace to electronics and renewable energy. By leveraging cross-disciplinary expertise and fostering strategic partnerships, the United States can position itself as a global leader in advanced manufacturing, setting new standards for quality, innovation, and sustainability.

One of the key strengths of this manufacturing transformation is its adaptability and resilience. In contrast to the volatility of global markets and supply chains, a robust domestic manufacturing base provides stability and security, mitigating risks associated with geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, and natural disasters. By decentralizing production and embracing local sourcing, America can reduce its dependence on foreign imports and safeguard its economic sovereignty.

Furthermore, the transition towards a manufacturing-centric economy aligns with broader societal goals, such as job creation, workforce development, and regional revitalization. By investing in vocational training programs, apprenticeships, and re-skilling initiatives, the United States can empower individuals from diverse backgrounds to thrive in the digital age and secure meaningful employment opportunities in the manufacturing sector.

As America embarks on this journey towards manufacturing excellence, it must also prioritize sustainability and environmental stewardship. By embracing eco-friendly practices, renewable energy sources, and circular economy principles, manufacturers can minimize their carbon footprint, reduce waste generation, and preserve natural resources for future generations.

In essence, the vision of America as the world’s greatest manufacturing hub represents a paradigm shift—one that transcends partisan politics and embraces a collective aspiration for progress, prosperity, and shared prosperity. By harnessing the transformative power of AI, blue-collar ingenuity, and interdisciplinary collaboration, the United States can reclaim its status as an industrial powerhouse and pioneer a new era of manufacturing innovation on the global stage.

As the nation embarks on this ambitious journey, it must remain steadfast in its commitment to inclusivity, sustainability, and technological leadership, ensuring that the benefits of the manufacturing renaissance are felt by all Americans and resonate across borders, shaping a brighter and more prosperous future for generations to come.

Continue Reading

Business

Outrage As Robinhood CEO Confesses To Elon Musk: DTCC Shut Down Stocks In Gamestop; AMC Surge

Published

on

Did Congressional authority allow DTCC to help defraud middle-class investors buying Gamestop and AMC?

The CEO of Robinhood admitted to Elon Musk that the DTCC – The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation – halted trading during a call Monday morning on the Clubhouse app.

Proof: https://youtu.be/K2CEImKce6s

This is not the first time this has happened…

2008 case: https://casetext.com/case/pet-quarters-v-depository-trust-clearing

Sound familiar?

This appears to be Pet Quarters having the same issue Robinhood has today.  When Pet Quarters took it to court, the courts said something along the lines of: f*** you, don’t ever come back here (citing technicalities).

Why did they win? Well, DTCC is given the authority by Congress to regulate despite technically being a private organization

There’s more – “To date, except for one case where DTCC’s dismissal motion is pending, all of the cases either have been dismissed by the courts or withdrawn by the plaintiffs.”

Proof: https://boards.fool.com/federal-court-dismisses-lawsuit-against-dtcc-24179123.aspx

Every AG in the country should be made aware of these facts and open investigations into the matter.

Why does Congress get to deputise a private organization as eco-hitmen for the market?

UPDATE (2/3/20 5:09 AM):

(Reuters) – Robinhood Chief Executive Vlad Tenev is expected to testify before a U.S. House committee on Feb. 18, Politico reported on Monday, citing people familiar with the matter.

The hearing before the House Financial Services Committee has not been formally announced, the report added

Continue Reading

Trending

Donate to Populist Wire

*Note: Every donation is greatly appreciated, regardless of the amount.