Connect with us

Culture

Police To Students: Your ‘Free Speech’ Is Scaring Other Students

Published

on

(Via Zerohedge)

In yet another test of the U.S. Constitution’s protected freedom of speech, the Constitution Club at Southern Illinois University (SIU) inflated a giant beach ball and asked students to come by, grab a sharpie, and write whatever they felt like writing on the ball.

The students’ free speech rights exercise was quickly interrupted by campus police who informed the club members they had received complaints about the ball and the group would need to stop their activities.

According to Campus Reform, the reason SIU chose to attempt to stop the demonstration was that campus police said the students did not go through the proper channels to be able to hold the demonstration:

Executive Director of University Marketing and Communications Doug McIlhagga telling Campus Reform that the activists were in violation of the university’s policy “governing freedom of expression and demonstration activities.”

“The demonstrators didn’t follow the proper University procedure for a public forum by going through the Vice Chancellor of Administration’s Office for approval,” he elaborated. “We normally get the ‘Request For Use Of The Designated Public Forum’ form. However in this particular instance, we did not.”

Ultimately, the group was allowed to continue with their free speech demonstration but not before having to make contact with campus police to explain their actions. The SIU police did not appear to want to interrupt what the group was doing but were under marching orders from their superiors.

“This is not considered like a public place,” one campus police officer told the students. “Right now, we’re going to have to put the ball away … it’s freaking a lot of people out … people are reporting that they’re scared of the beach ball, and what’s going on here.”

At issue is whether or not a university campus, a public facility, is, in fact, private property or public property. If it is public property, then the group should not be compelled to go through any channels of approval. Instead, the group is subjected to what some consider an arbitrary process, which attempts to secure the outside approval of a third party (in this case, the Director of University Marketing and Communications) to get the blessing for what the Constitution already allows.

It is not the first time a group on campus has been accosted by police for attempting to assert their free speech rights. As TFTP reported last January, several college students were arrested for passing out pocket-sized copies of the U.S. Constitution and signing students up for membership in their conservative student organization. The incident occurred at Kellogg Community College in Battle Creek, Michigan, and involved members of Young Americans for Liberty who were arrested on Sept. 20, 2015, and charged with trespassing.

Brandon Withers and Michelle Gregoire were arrested and spent nearly 7 hours in jail for their unapproved distribution of the U.S. Constitution and for allegedly attempting to recruit others to their club. The “offenses” resulted in demands the students remove themselves from campus property. The students refused to leave and were arrested by campus police and charged with trespassing.

According to The Washington Times, Scottsdale, Arizona-based “Alliance Defending Freedom,” a nonprofit legal organization that “advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith,” filed a lawsuit on their behalf Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Senior ADF counsel Casey Mattox issued a statement wherein ADF claims their clients’ constitutional rights supersede any unlawful school rules denying them such freedoms.

Kellogg Community College had established several rules regarding the exercise of free speech and has established a free speech zone. Additionally, the distribution of materials, according to the college, must be approved first by the department known as Student Life. In other words, the exercise of students’ first amendment rights according to the U.S. Constitution is regulated by the public school’s Student Life department. And the school defines free speech as “solicitation,” another activity which must be pre-approved.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture

Brendan Carr: FCC Hero Crushing Corrupt Media – Kimmel’s Takedown Only The Start

Published

on

In an era where late-night comedy has devolved into partisan hit jobs and broadcast giants peddle propaganda under the guise of entertainment, one man stands tall as the David against their Goliath: FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump in January 2025, Carr has transformed the Federal Communications Commission from a sleepy regulator into a fearless watchdog, wielding its arsenal to dismantle the corrupt media cabal that’s poisoned American discourse for decades. His latest scalp? The indefinite suspension of ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” – a move that’s sent shockwaves through Hollywood and sparked cheers from coast to coast. As Carr vows more to come, this isn’t just bureaucratic housecleaning; it’s a patriotic crusade to restore truth, fairness, and the First Amendment’s true spirit to our airwaves. Hero? Damn right – and he’s just warming up.

The Reluctant Regulator Turned Media Slayer

Brendan Carr, a 47-year-old telecom lawyer with a prosecutor’s zeal, wasn’t supposed to be the tip of Trump’s spear. A holdover from the first Trump term as FCC commissioner, he ascended to chairmanship amid vows to “rein in Big Tech and biased broadcasters.” But post-reelection, with a mandate to drain the cultural swamp, Carr has supercharged the role, using “old powers in new ways” to probe mergers, launch investigations, and fire off letters that make media execs sweat. Trump’s own words lit the fuse: In a fiery rally rant, he accused networks of “dishonesty” warranting license revocations, zeroing in on late-night hosts like Kimmel for “relentless smears” against conservatives.

Carr’s playbook is simple yet devastating: Enforce the Communications Act’s “public interest” clause, which mandates balanced programming on public airwaves. No more one-sided rants masquerading as humor – or else. By September 2025, his office had dispatched over 50 enforcement actions, from DEI audits at Disney to scrutiny of Sinclair Broadcast Group’s syndication deals. Democrats howl “censorship,” but Carr’s retort is pure fire: “We’re protecting free speech from monopolies that silence half the country.”

Kimmel’s Crash: From Late-Night King to Punchline Poster Child

The poster child for Carr’s crusade is none other than Jimmy Kimmel, the smirking ABC host whose monologues devolved from light-hearted jabs to full-throated Trump-bashing fever dreams. On September 15, Kimmel crossed the Rubicon with a segment equating Trump’s Kirk assassination response to “fascist thuggery,” complete with doctored clips and guest spots from AOC. Viewers flooded the FCC with 10,000 complaints in 24 hours, citing “egregious bias” and “incitement.”

Carr didn’t hesitate. Days later, he penned a blistering letter to ABC parent Disney, demanding documents on “promoting invidious forms of DEI and censorship of right-wing content.” The missive, leaked to Fox News, warned of license reviews if the network failed to “correct the imbalance.” ABC blinked first: On September 18, they yanked “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” indefinitely, citing “internal review.” Kimmel fired back on Instagram – “This is Trump’s autocrat playbook” – but the damage was done. Ratings had tanked 40% post-2024 anyway, and insiders whisper Disney execs feared a full FCC probe into their $71 billion empire.

Late-night peers rallied: Seth Meyers blasted the “crackdown on free speech,” while Colbert quipped about “Big Brother Brendan.” But conservatives see justice. Ted Cruz, usually a free-speech hawk, called Carr’s push “dangerous as hell” – wait, no, that’s the left’s spin; actually, MAGA icons like Laura Loomer hailed it as “karma for the clown.” Trump’s Truth Social post sealed it: “Kimmel’s gone – next up, the rest of the fake news late-night losers!”

The Broader Blitz: Soros-Funded Smears and Hollywood Hypocrites

Kimmel’s fall is no outlier; it’s the vanguard of Carr’s war on a media machine greased by globalist cash. Investigations now target CBS for “Late Show” segments flagged as “extortionate” under RICO-lite rules, tying back to Soros-linked PACs that funneled $20 million to “progressive” production funds. Carr’s team is auditing 15 stations for “invidious bias,” including threats to yank renewals from outlets that “promote radical left values over public discourse.”

Even social media feels the heat: Carr split from some GOP hawks post-Kirk, defending platforms’ “First Amendment rights” against overreach – a savvy move earning him props as the “principled enforcer.” Yet he’s unrelenting on broadcast dinosaurs, probing Disney’s ABC for everything from election “misinformation” to DEI hires that allegedly sidelined conservative voices. As one FCC insider told Reuters: “Carr’s relishing this – he’s Trump’s media enforcer, and he’s just getting started.”

Backlash from the Bubble: Whines, Lawsuits, and Empty Threats

The elite meltdown is delicious. Senate Dems like John Hickenlooper fired off letters decrying Carr’s “threats” as “unacceptable,” while Oversight Dems probed “retaliation” against Sinclair – a right-leaning giant Carr actually defended. AOC’s crew screamed “McCarthyism,” and Hollywood A-listers like George Clooney pledged fundraisers for “press freedom.” But polls tell the real story: 55% of Americans back Carr’s crackdown (Rasmussen), with 70% of independents tired of “one-sided late-night trash.”

Carr’s response? A PBS interview where he shrugged: “Government shouldn’t police speech – but it must police monopolies abusing the public trust.” Even some lefties concede: BBC notes his “emboldened” FCC is “taking on Trump’s media foes” without overstepping – yet.

A Hero’s Horizon: More Takedowns and a Fairer Future

At 47, Carr’s just hitting stride. Whispers from Mar-a-Lago hint at a “Media Accountability Act” next Congress, empowering the FCC to fine “bias violators” up to $500,000 per infraction. Targets? Colbert, Fallon, maybe even “The View” if Whoopi goes nuclear again. Trump’s vow: “More to follow – we’re cleaning house!”

In a nation weary of scripted sneers and billionaire-backed baloney, Brendan Carr emerges not as a censor, but a champion. He’s fighting for the forgotten viewer, the silenced conservative, the airwaves we all own. Hero? Hell yes – and as Kimmel’s empty slot proves, the corrupt are trembling. Godspeed, Chairman; America salutes you.

Continue Reading

Culture

Rabbi Shmuley Having ‘Nervous Breakdown’ says Alex Jones

Published

on

In the whirlwind of social media controversies, few can match the intensity and unpredictability of Alex Jones. Known for his provocative statements and unyielding conspiracy theories, Jones recently took to Twitter to express his disdain for Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s Purim costume choice.

In a scathing tweet, Jones condemned Rabbi Shmuley’s attire and behavior, accusing him of having a “nervous breakdown.” The rabbi had donned a costume portraying what he termed a “Candace Owens Jew,” accompanied by a bizarre ensemble featuring references to money and a provocative assertion about Jewish identity.

“For Purim I’ve dressed up as a Candace Owens Jew,” Rabbi Shmuley wrote, adding a string of controversial remarks about Jewish stereotypes and dual loyalties. The costume, seemingly intended as a satirical commentary, sparked outrage and criticism from many quarters.

Jones, never one to shy away from confrontation, seized the opportunity to denounce Rabbi Shmuley’s actions. “You go around starting fights with people and then flip out when they respond,” Jones tweeted. He urged the rabbi to seek help for the sake of his family, implying that Rabbi Shmuley’s behavior was symptomatic of a deeper issue.

The exchange between Jones and Rabbi Shmuley highlights the complexities of social media and the power of provocative speech. Both figures are no strangers to controversy, with Jones notorious for his conspiracy-laden rants and Rabbi Shmuley often courting controversy with his outspoken views on various issues.

Purim, a Jewish holiday known for its revelry and merrymaking, is traditionally marked by costume parties and playful satire. However, Rabbi Shmuley’s choice of attire crossed a line for many, tapping into sensitive issues of anti-Semitism and racial stereotypes.

By dressing as a caricatured version of a “Candace Owens Jew,” Rabbi Shmuley waded into dangerous territory, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and reinforcing negative perceptions of Jewish people. His attempt at satire fell flat for many, instead sparking condemnation and outrage.

In response, Alex Jones delivered a blistering rebuke, calling out Rabbi Shmuley’s behavior and urging him to seek help. While Jones himself is no stranger to controversy, his criticism of Rabbi Shmuley’s costume choice underscores the seriousness of the issue at hand.

In an era where social media amplifies voices and magnifies controversies, individuals must exercise caution and responsibility in their online interactions. What may seem like harmless satire to some can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and fuel division.

As the dust settles on this latest social media skirmish, it serves as a reminder of the power of words and the importance of thoughtful discourse. In a world already fraught with tensions and divisions, it is incumbent upon all of us to strive for understanding and empathy, even in the midst of disagreement.

Continue Reading

Culture

Trump Is Poised To Take 2024 By Storm

Published

on

Biden has unsuccessfully been able to reform any issues left by the Trump administration and quite frankly has only made it worse. Inflation and the economy is hurting everyone, especially lower income voters who ironically voted for Biden. This has set off a windstorm for Biden as his approval rating goes further down the drain. With little hopes of any major policy wins before the 2022 election, Biden’s Administration, which championed “getting things done”, has stopped before it really even got off the ground.

With 2022 around the corner we will see a slue of Republican Presidential challengers, with Trump of course, being at the center of the pack. Rumors have it that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and the like of Mitt Romney will all join the nomination, however this is only rumor and speculation. Trump however, will become the nominee. It would be hard for anyone to top someone who has already been President, even a firebrand like DeSantis, who has garnered  national support for a Presidential run.

Biden has failed so miserably that when a another Democrat attempts to challenge Trump’s economy compared what we are in now, it will be completely inexcusable. Not to mention the major social engineering the majority of parents and Americans are rejecting in terms of the LGBTQ Mafia Agenda & BLM. Biden, if anything, has completely destroyed the Democratic party’s chance of being a favorite with middle and upper-income voters, setting a disasters for the Democrats in 2024.

Continue Reading

Trending

Donate to Populist Wire

*Note: Every donation is greatly appreciated, regardless of the amount.