Connect with us

U.S.

Trump Curse Comes Back For Depp: Ex-Lawyers Sue Him Back

Published

on

(Via Deadline)

Still wrestling in the courts with his former business managers over millions, home foreclosures and claims of excess, Johnny Depp now finds himself at the legal receiving end of one of Hollywood’s biggest lawyers in a $30 million sword fight that is sure to take some of the cheer out of his Christmas.

Less than two months after the thrashing Pirates of the Caribbean star dragged his old attorney Jacob Bloom and his Bloom Hergott Diemer Rosenthal LaViolette Feldman Schenkman & Goodman LLP firm into the battle with The Management Group with a malpractice suit, the lawyers have sued back.

“Bloom Hergott has been damaged, and continues to be damaged, to the extent the parties’ fee agreement is not enforced and Cross-Defendants have not paid the reasonable value of the legal services that Bloom Hergott provided to Cross-Defendants, in an amount to be proven at trial, plus interest,” said a cross-complaint from Bloom and the firm filed last week in LA Superior Court against Depp and his corporate entities. The firm provided Depp with legal representation for decades and up to July of this year, according to the cross-complaint.

Claiming that there never was a “statutorily prescribed written contract” with his long time lawyer, Depp’s October 18 suit declared that “instead of protecting Mr. Depp’s interests, Defendants engaged in misconduct for their own financial benefit and violated some of the most basic tenets of the attorney-client relationship, all to Mr. Depp’s serious financial detriment, causing Mr. Depp substantial economic harm.”

At the same time as launching their cross-complaint, Bloom and his firm have also answered that scathing accusation by basically pronouncing the actor his own worst enemy. “The events and happenings alleged in the complaint, as well as ensuing injuries and losses, if any, were proximately caused and contributed to by the negligence, fault, and misconduct of Plaintiffs and/or their agents and representatives (whose acts, conduct, and/or omissions are chargeable to Plaintiffs),” said the now canned Depp attorneys to the seemingly financially tight Murder On The Orient Express cast member.

Johnny Depp’s DC-based lawyer Adam Waldman did not respond to request from Deadline for comment on the latest sets of filings.

While a further dunking for Depp, the cross-complaint and response shouldn’t be that big a surprise, as back in late October reps for Bloom and the firm said that they saw things differently than “Mr. Depp and his counsel on the law and the facts, and intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously.”

It also follows the pattern of the TMG dust-up after the actor first sued his old long time biz mangagers in a $25 million lawsuit back in January.

Soon afterwards, TMG filed a cross-complaint of their own against Depp in response to his suit that proclaimed that the actor’s spending habits were the real cause of his apparently shrinking bank accounts and he owed them over $500,000 in unpaid commissions. As the second of many shots the two sides have taken against each other since, that cross-complaint damningly detailed an opulent lifestyle of homes all over the world, lavish art collections, cars, boats, plus the $3 million Depp spent to launch the ashes of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson out of a cannon in 2005 and the $2 million he pays out every month on day-to-day expenses.

As the bile blew in both directions, TMG brought out a big cannon on November 8 and filed an action for judicial foreclosure against Depp. The dramatic move was to force the sale of five City of Angels properties owned by Depp run trusts to help repay a $5 million loan that TMG claim they made to the strapped actor in December 2012.

Right now, the next benchmark in this matter with Bloom and his firm is a case management conference pencilled in for March 16, 2018. However, if the love of litigation that this case and the TMG case has shown, is any roadmap, expect more paperwork salvos to be shot across the respective bows before then.

Jacob Bloom and his firm are being represented in this dust-up with their ex-client by Kurt Peterson, Peter Kennedy and Matthew Wrensahll of LA’s Reed Smith LLP.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

President Trump’s Paxton Plan For U.S. Attorney General

Published

on

In a recent turn of events, former President Donald Trump has hinted at considering Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton for the role of U.S. Attorney General if he were to win a second term in the White House. This announcement, made during a conversation with Fox 4 Dallas-Fort Worth at the National Rifle Association convention, has sparked a flurry of speculation and discussion among political circles.

The potential appointment of Paxton to the U.S. Attorney General position raises several questions and concerns. Critics point to Paxton’s legal battles and controversies, including accusations of bribery and abuse of office, which led to his impeachment by the Texas House. These allegations were dismissed in the Senate, but they remain a point of contention.

On the other hand, Paxton’s supporters praise his legal battles against the Biden administration and his unwavering support for Trump. They see him as a strong candidate who would vigorously defend conservative values and push back against perceived liberal overreach.

This potential appointment also raises the question of how it would affect the dynamics within the Republican Party. Some Republicans, like Senator John Cornyn, have been critical of Paxton, suggesting that a Paxton nomination could lead to intraparty battles.

Trump’s consideration of Paxton is not just a political move but also a strategic one. It signals a continuation of his policies and a commitment to his base. It also underscores the importance of loyalty in Trump’s political calculus, a trait he clearly values in Paxton.

Now, let’s delve into why Trump should pick Paxton for the U.S. Attorney General position.

Firstly, Paxton’s track record as Texas Attorney General demonstrates his commitment to conservative values and his willingness to fight for them. He has been at the forefront of legal battles against the Biden administration, challenging policies on issues such as immigration and voting rights. His actions have made him a popular figure among conservatives, a fact that Trump would certainly be aware of.

Secondly, Paxton has shown unwavering loyalty to Trump. He has filed lawsuits to defend Trump’s policies and has been a vocal supporter of the former president. This loyalty is something Trump values highly, as evidenced by his past appointments.

Thirdly, Paxton’s potential appointment would send a strong message to the Republican Party and to the country as a whole. It would signal a continuation of Trump’s policies and a commitment to his base. It would also serve as a reminder of Trump’s influence within the party and his ability to shape its direction.

Finally, Paxton’s potential appointment would likely be well-received by Trump’s base. His conservative credentials and his legal battles against the Biden administration would be seen as a strong endorsement of Trump’s policies and a promise to continue fighting for them.

In conclusion, while there are valid concerns about Paxton’s past controversies, there are also strong arguments in favor of his potential appointment as U.S. Attorney General. His conservative credentials, his loyalty to Trump, and the message his appointment would send to the Republican Party and the country as a whole make him a strong candidate for the position.

Continue Reading

Groyper

Nick Fuentes’ Live Stream Hacked to Play Obscene Material

Published

on

Nick Fuentes, a controversial figure known for his far-right views, recently found himself at the center of a hacking incident that disrupted his online activities. The incident, which occurred in May 2024, led to his proprietary livestreaming site being compromised, with the alleged culprits claiming to be associated with the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) Unit 8200.

The hacking incident involved unauthorized content being posted on Fuentes’ platform, including watermarking of illicit content and messages left on the back end of the site. This event has sparked discussions among Fuentes’ followers and the wider online community about the importance of cybersecurity and the need for content creators to remain vigilant in protecting their digital presence.

Despite the disruption caused by the hacking incident, Fuentes has demonstrated resilience and determination to continue his online activities. The event has also raised questions about the security measures employed by Fuentes’ platform and the potential vulnerabilities that may have been exploited. As online content creators continue to face challenges in safeguarding their platforms, it is essential for them to remain proactive in defending their digital presence.

The hacking incident involving Nick Fuentes serves as a stark reminder of the ever-present threat of cyber attacks in the digital age. It highlights the importance of cybersecurity and the need for content creators to invest in robust security measures to protect their work and reputation. As the investigation into the hacking incident unfolds, it is hoped that valuable lessons can be learned to prevent similar occurrences in the future and ensure the safety and integrity of online platforms.

Continue Reading

Military

Lucas Gage Returns to X After Exposing Palestine Atrocities & Ban Over Alleged Harassment

Published

on

In today’s digital age, social media platforms serve as vital tools for raising awareness and advocating for causes. However, they also present challenges such as harassment and censorship. Recently, actor and activist Lucas Gage faced these challenges head-on when his X account was suspended for several months following harassment from certain groups unhappy with his efforts to expose war atrocities in Palestine. Now, after a prolonged absence, Gage has returned to X, ready to resume his important work of shedding light on crucial issues.

Lucas Gage, known for his roles in various television shows and films, has also been vocal about social justice issues, particularly regarding the Palestinian cause. His advocacy drew the ire of individuals and groups who disagreed with his stance. Gage utilized his platform on X to spotlight the human rights violations and war atrocities occurring in Palestine, which led to backlash from some pro-Israeli factions.

The backlash against Gage escalated into harassment, predominantly from individuals identifying themselves as Zionists. He faced a barrage of abusive messages, threats, and attempts to undermine his activism. Despite his efforts to report and block the harassers, the situation persisted, taking a toll on Gage’s mental well-being and sense of safety.

In a controversial decision, X suspended Gage’s account, citing violations of its community guidelines. Many criticized X for what they perceived as a failure to address harassment effectively, especially given the circumstances surrounding Gage’s case. The ban sparked debates about freedom of expression, censorship, and the responsibilities of social media platforms in safeguarding users from harassment and abuse.

After a hiatus spanning several months, Lucas Gage has made his comeback to X. His return has been met with an outpouring of support from fellow activists, fans, and individuals concerned about censorship and human rights. Gage expressed gratitude for the overwhelming solidarity he received during his absence and reiterated his dedication to advocating for justice and raising awareness about the plight of the Palestinian people.

The incident involving Lucas Gage underscores the significance of advocacy and the hurdles activists encounter, especially when addressing contentious issues. It also highlights the complexities of navigating social media platforms where differing viewpoints often clash, sometimes resulting in hostility and censorship.

As Gage resumes his activism on X, it is imperative to continue discussions about online harassment, censorship, and the necessity for improved mechanisms to shield users from abuse. Social media companies must reevaluate their policies and enforcement strategies to ensure that platforms remain spaces for constructive dialogue and activism, rather than avenues for harassment and stifling dissenting voices.

Lucas Gage’s return to X serves as a testament to the resilience of individuals committed to social justice causes despite facing obstacles and adversity. His experience sheds light on broader issues surrounding online harassment and censorship, prompting important conversations about the role of social media platforms in shaping public discourse. As Gage continues his advocacy, his story serves as inspiration for others to speak out against injustice and strive for positive change.

Continue Reading

Trending

Donate to Populist Wire

*Note: Every donation is greatly appreciated, regardless of the amount.