Connect with us

Media

LA Times Publisher Caught Up In #MeToo Movement

Published

on

(Via The Daily Wire)

The paper has been instrumental in breaking stories about alleged Hollywood sexual harassers like Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey, and Russell Simmons, but now the LA Times, and its CEO and publisher, Ross Levinsohn, have fallen into the #MeToo cross-hairs.

According to a report published by National Public Radio, Levinsohn, who has been at the helm of the Times for the past six months, “has been a defendant in two sexual harassment lawsuits and that his conduct in work settings over the past two decades has been called into question repeatedly by female colleagues.”

NPR reportedly interviewed 26 of Levinsohn’s former colleagues and obtained court and financial documents that indicated Levinsohn has been on the hook for alleged sexual impropriety several times during his tenure.

In one case, NPR reports, Levinsohn “admitted to rating the relative ‘hotness’ of his female colleagues in office banter as a vice president at a digital media company. He also testified that he speculated about whether a woman who worked for him there was a stripper on the side.”

In another, Levinsohn was accused of kissing a woman who was not his wife at a music industry dinner, in front of friends and colleagues. And, perhaps worst, NPR alleges, Levinsohn “once told an executive for the Hollywood Reporter he would not stay at the publication’s lunch honoring the entertainment business’ most influential fashion stylists because he would have to be surrounded by gays.”

He didn’t use the word “gays,” however, the source claims. He used an epithet.

In at least one case, Levinsohn was not a lone defendant. Levinsohn was an executive with search engine company Alta Vista when he and several other C-suite employees were sued by a female subordinate over what she claimed was a “hostile work enviroment.” The woman, Christine Fox, and others who testified in that sexual harassment case, alleged that Levinsohn created a “frat house” like workplace where he and others felt free to ask women about their sex lives.

In his testimony, Levinsohn said that he did joke about people in the office but that “any sexually charged banter he participated in took place at a distance from female employees.”

In another case, Levinsohn was sued as part of a team at NewsCorp. There, again, the woman who filed suit alleged a hostile workplace where sexual banter and sexual harassment was the norm.

Levinsohn calls NPR’s allegations “lies” and suggests that he might obtain legal counsel. Neither Levinsohn nor the Times’ parent company, Tronc, responded to NPR’s questions. Tronc has not taken any action against Levinsohn.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Media

Assange’s Freedom: A Blow to the Neo-Con and Neo-Liberal Elite

Published

on

In a surprising turn of events, Julian Assange, the controversial founder of WikiLeaks, has been freed from prison, sending shockwaves through the political establishment. For years, Assange has been a thorn in the side of the global elite, exposing their secrets and lies to the world. Now, as he walks free, many on the right-wing populist side of the aisle are celebrating, while others, particularly those with skeletons in their closets, are trembling in fear.

The release of Julian Assange is a victory for truth and transparency. For too long, the powers that be have operated in the shadows, manipulating the masses and advancing their own agendas. Assange and WikiLeaks have been instrumental in shining a light on the dark underbelly of global politics, revealing the corruption and deceit that permeates our institutions.

However, not everyone is happy about Assange’s newfound freedom. Neo-cons and neo-liberals, who have long been in cahoots with the global elite, are terrified that their treasonous activities will be exposed. They fear that Assange’s release will lead to a flood of information that will expose their lies and destroy their carefully constructed narratives.

Take, for example, Mike Pence, the former Vice President of the United States. Pence, a known neo-conservative, has been a vocal opponent of Assange and WikiLeaks. Why? Because he knows that his own treasonous actions could be exposed. Pence has been accused of colluding with foreign powers and selling out the American people for his own gain. The release of Assange could be the final nail in the coffin for Pence and his ilk.

The truth is, the opposition to Assange’s release is not about national security or protecting classified information. It’s about protecting the interests of the global elite and their puppets in government. The neo-cons and neo-liberals are terrified of losing their grip on power, and they will do anything to silence those who threaten their reign.

But the people are waking up. They are tired of being lied to and manipulated. They are hungry for the truth, and they will not be silenced. The release of Julian Assange is a step in the right direction, but it is only the beginning. The fight for truth and transparency is far from over.

As a right-wing populist, I believe that the people have a right to know the truth about their leaders and the institutions that govern them. I believe that the global elite and their puppets in government should be held accountable for their actions. I believe that Julian Assange is a hero, and his release is a victory for the people.

So, to Mike Pence and all the other neo-cons and neo-liberals who oppose Assange’s release, I say this: The truth will come out, and you will be exposed for the traitors that you are. The people will not be silenced, and they will not be fooled. The fight for truth and transparency is just beginning, and we will not rest until justice is served.

Continue Reading

Media

The Feds vs. Alex Jones: InfoWars Under Siege

Published

on

In a stunning turn of events, the federal government is reportedly in the process of seizing the Infowars studio owned by Alex Jones. This move is seen by many as a direct retaliation against Jones for his years of questioning the system and popularizing alternative narratives.

The news comes at a time when the political landscape is more polarized than ever, with the government seemingly tightening its grip on dissenting voices. The alleged seizure of the Infowars studio is a stark reminder of the challenges faced by those who dare to question the status quo.

Alex Jones has been a controversial figure for years, known for his conspiracy theories and for challenging mainstream narratives. His platform, Infowars, has been a beacon for those who feel disenfranchised by the traditional media and political systems.

This move by the government is not just about Jones, but about the broader issue of free speech and the right to question authority. It’s a clear message that anyone who dares to challenge the system can expect to face consequences.

In the midst of this turmoil, it’s worth noting the support that Jones and his Infowars platform have received from unlikely sources. Dan Lyman and Alex Jones were among the first to support Populist Wire when it began back in 2017. This support highlights the solidarity among those who believe in the power of free speech and the importance of challenging the system.

As we watch the unfolding drama of the Feds vs. Alex Jones, we are reminded of the fragility of free speech and the importance of defending it. The seizure of the Infowars studio is not just a blow to Jones, but to all of us who value the freedom to question, to challenge, and to seek the truth.

In the end, it’s not just about Alex Jones or Infowars. It’s about the fundamental right to free speech and the right to question the system. The battle is far from over, and the outcome will have far-reaching implications for us all.

Continue Reading

Media

Unraveling the Foxes’ Reality: Media Ownership and its Impact on American Society

Published

on

In a quaint country nestled between rolling hills and lush landscapes, a peculiar phenomenon has caught the attention of keen observers – a population of foxes and a small group of wolves dominating the media landscape. As the media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and influencing societal discourse, the concentration of media ownership in the hands of a select few wolves raises significant questions about the health of democracy in this country.

The metaphorical foxes in this story represent the general public, diverse in their perspectives and experiences. Meanwhile, the small group of wolves symbolizes a concentrated ownership of media outlets, wielding immense influence over the narratives that reach the ears and eyes of the foxes. In a democracy, a free and unbiased media is essential for fostering informed citizens and promoting a healthy exchange of ideas.

The concern arises when a handful of media entities, owned by a select group of wolves, begin to dictate the narratives that shape public perception. This concentration of media power can lead to a lack of diversity in voices and perspectives, stifling the rich tapestry of opinions that is essential for a vibrant and thriving democracy.

One of the primary issues that arises in such a scenario is the potential for biased reporting and selective coverage. The wolves, with their vested interests, may inadvertently or purposefully promote narratives that align with their agenda, sidelining important issues that don’t fit their narrative. This selective reporting can mislead the foxes, hindering their ability to make informed decisions and participate effectively in the democratic process.

Moreover, the dominance of a small group of wolves in the media landscape may lead to the suppression of dissenting voices. A healthy democracy thrives on open dialogue, constructive criticism, and the ability to question those in power. When media ownership is concentrated, there is a risk that alternative perspectives may be marginalized, limiting the diversity of opinions that should ideally flourish in a democratic society.

To address these concerns, it is imperative that the foxes, the general public, become aware of the dynamics at play in their media landscape. Investigative journalism and public discourse are vital tools in unveiling the motivations and potential biases of media owners. By actively engaging with various sources of information and encouraging media literacy, the foxes can empower themselves to critically evaluate the narratives presented to them.

Furthermore, regulatory bodies and policymakers should closely scrutinize media ownership patterns to ensure a fair and diverse representation of voices in the public sphere. Implementing measures to prevent monopolies or oligopolies in media ownership will contribute to a more democratic media landscape.

In conclusion, the story of foxes and wolves in this country serves as a compelling allegory for the importance of media diversity and transparency in a thriving democracy. As the foxes awaken to the realities of media ownership, it becomes crucial for them to demand accountability, transparency, and a media landscape that reflects the true plurality of their society. After all, a democracy flourishes when the voices of all its citizens are heard, not just those of a select few.

Continue Reading

Trending

Donate to Populist Wire

*Note: Every donation is greatly appreciated, regardless of the amount.