Connect with us

Politics

#DrainTheSwamp Obama/Hezbollah Conspiracy Demands Investigation – US Congressmen

Published

on

(Via NewsWars)

Congressman Robert Pittenger is calling for a formal investigation into the Obama administration’s alleged interference in a multi-agency investigation targeting Hezbollah’s illegal drug dealing, money laundering and arms running.

On Monday, Pittenger sent a letter to Chairman Trey Gowdy of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform urging the body to look into allegations reported by Politico over the weekend that revealed the Obama administration shielded Hezbollah from the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Project Cassandra.

“Now, it appears in order to secure his deeply flawed Iran Deal, President Obama and his administration shielded the Iran-backed terror group Hezbollah from a major US multi-agency investigation targeting Hezbollah’s global criminal operation which included drug dealing, money laundering and arms running,” said Congressman Pittenger in a statement.

“These revelations are shocking and infuriating,” Pittenger continued. “While American soldiers were bravely fighting ISIS terrorists, with some paying the ultimate price, the Obama administration reportedly was protecting Hezbollah terrorists who were funding themselves by trafficking illegal drugs. No wonder President Obama couldn’t bring himself to call them ‘Radical Islamist Terrorists.’”

Project Cassandra, a campaign launched by the DEA in 2008, found that Hezbollah collected $1 billion a year from money laundering, criminal activities, and drug and weapons trade. The task force found that the Iran back organization was shipping cocaine through Venezuela and Mexico to the United States.

According to Politico’s report, published Sunday, Obama’s Justice Department refused to file charges against those involved.

“The administration also rejected repeated efforts by Project Cassandra members to charge Hezbollah’s military wing as an ongoing criminal enterprise under a federal Mafia-style racketeering statute, task force members say,” Politico reported.

The report also claims that the Obama administration blocked the Cassandra Project from receiving a number of legal tools that would have helped them halt Hezbollah’s illegal activities.

It apparently became more difficult for the DEA task force to conduct its investigation the closer the Obama administration came to finalizing the Iran nuclear deal. Task force members were moved to other assignments as soon as the deal was complete.

“As the operation reached into the higher levels of Hezbollah, the revelations threatened to undermine the Obama Administrations nuclear talks with Iran,” reads Congressman Pittenger’s letter to the House Committee on Oversight. “DEA officials on “Project Cassandra” purportedly faced increased obstacles from political appointees within the Obama Administration.”

Pittenger is calling for public hearings and the release of any documents on the matter.

Politico’s report sparked former Israeli Finance Minister Yair Lapid to demand Obama turn in his Nobel Peace Prize if the accusations are true.

“If the report is correct,” Lapid said on Monday, “then Barack Obama must return the Nobel Peace Prize he received.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Rob Sand Must Be Audited Along with LGI

Published

on

Rob Sand won the Iowa governor’s race as the state’s auditor. That dual role demands immediate scrutiny of his own office and of LGI, the family business run by his wife, Christine Lauridsen Sand. Taxpayers have a right to know whether any public contracts, grants, or favorable treatment flowed between the auditor’s office and the company while he held statewide power. Iowa does not get a free pass on conflicts simply because the winner is a Democrat.

America First means accountability for officials who oversee public money. Sand built his career on auditing others. The same standard now applies to him and to LGI. Any overlap in finances, vendor relationships, or use of state resources must be examined by independent review before he takes the governor’s office. Working families in Iowa already face water-quality issues, budget pressures, and education concerns. They should not also wonder whether family business interests influenced decisions made in the auditor’s office.

An audit of Sand’s tenure and of LGI is the minimum required for confidence in the transition. If irregularities appear, they must be referred for further investigation. Sovereignty and basic fairness require that the next governor faces the same transparency he once claimed to enforce. Iowa voters deserve nothing less before he is sworn in.

Continue Reading

Politics

2028: America First Dark Horse Must Rise

Published

on

The 2026 midterms cleared the field. Democrats took Congress after voters punished high gas prices and the Iran war. Establishment heirs now carry that baggage. JD Vance’s odds slipped overnight. Marco Rubio remains tied to the same foreign-policy circle that produced the conflict. Neither can lead a clean America First recovery. The candidate must be anyone but Vance or Rubio.

That dark horse must run on sealed borders, an end to forever wars, energy independence, and trade that puts American workers first. Traditional values and biological reality in policy cannot be treated as optional. The midterms showed the cost of foreign entanglements and elite priorities. Working families want their government focused on home, not distant conflicts or cultural experiments. Only a figure free of prior establishment ties—and free of Vance or Rubio—can make that case without apology.

The next two years will decide whether the movement stays pure or dilutes into another round of managed decline. A dark horse who rejects globalist deals, defends sovereignty, and speaks plainly to the base can consolidate the realignment before 2028. The country does not need another caretaker from the current circle. It needs someone new who will finish what America First started.

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrats Gave Ground on Their Wackiest Issues to “Win”

Published

on

The midterm results show Democrats winning by dialing back the cultural extremes that defined their last several cycles. In Texas, James Talarico walked back earlier progressive positions on transgender issues to make himself viable in a state that rejected those policies for decades. Elsewhere, candidates who once embraced open borders, defund-the-police rhetoric, and identity-first messaging softened or ignored those planks and focused on costs, the Iran war, and gasoline prices. The public had already rejected the full agenda; the party simply stopped advertising the parts voters hated most.

America First voters never accepted boys in girls’ sports, men in women’s shelters, or sanctuary policies that prioritize non-citizens over citizens. Polling and prior elections already showed those positions as losers outside the coastal core. By muting them in red and purple districts while hammering inflation and foreign wars, Democrats could appeal to working-class Hispanics, independents, and some traditional Democrats who had shifted right. The strategy worked for one night because the economic pain was acute and the alternative was a party tied to high gas prices. It does not mean the underlying cultural preferences of the country changed.

Once in power, the same figures and progressive caucuses will push the old agenda again—Medicare for All, ending enforcement, and cultural mandates. The temporary ground they gave was tactical, not principled. Working Americans still want secure borders, biological reality in policy, and government that puts citizens first. The midterms proved the left cannot win by leading with its most extreme ideas. They also proved those ideas remain the party’s destination once the ballots are counted.

Continue Reading

Trending

Donate to Populist Wire

*Note: Every donation is greatly appreciated, regardless of the amount.