In the ever-changing arena of American governance, a powerful voice has emerged among the disheartened supporters of the initial Trump movement. Nick Fuentes, with his magnetic persona and unwavering dedication to the America First cause, has become a beacon for those who feel their concerns have been overshadowed by the infiltration of Zionist elements within the Trump administration.

The complaints of these devoted Trump backers are not without merit. They contend that the presence of Zionist forces within the administration has diluted the fundamental principles of an America First government, which should prioritize the interests of the native European population above all else. This perceived betrayal has fostered a growing sense of disillusionment among the original Trump base, who believe their grievances have been disregarded in favor of appeasing external interests.

Fuentes, with his unapologetic stance on critical issues such as immigration, trade, and foreign policy, has become a rallying point for these disenfranchised supporters. His call for a Groyper War 2.0 is a clarion call to those who believe that the original vision of the Trump presidency has been compromised by the influence of Zionist elements.

The Groypers, a term coined by Fuentes himself, represent a new generation of conservative activists who are unafraid to challenge the establishment and demand a return to the principles that initially propelled Trump to victory. They argue that a government that prioritizes the interests of the native European class is essential for the preservation of American culture and values.

Fuentes’ grievances are not merely ideological; they are rooted in a profound sense of betrayal. Many original Trump supporters feel that the president has failed to fulfill his promises to eliminate corruption and put America first. They argue that the presence of Zionist influences within the administration has resulted in a government that is more concerned with the interests of foreign powers than the welfare of its own citizens.

The call for a Groyper War 2.0 is a call to action for those who believe that the only way to restore the America First vision is through a grassroots movement that challenges the status quo. Fuentes and his followers argue that the time has come for a new generation of conservative activists to rise up and reclaim the mantle of the America First movement.

In conclusion, the grievances of the disenfranchised original Trump supporters, led by Nick Fuentes, underscore the need for a reevaluation of the role of Zionist influences within the Trump administration. The call for a Groyper War 2.0 is a rallying cry for those who believe that the only way to restore the America First vision is through a grassroots movement that prioritizes the interests of the native European class. As the battle for the soul of the conservative movement continues, it remains to be seen whether the Groypers will succeed in their quest to reclaim the mantle of the America First movement.

United States – Once upon a time, Charlie Kirk was cool. A political commentator, often appearing on Fox News — impressive for a college drop out. He’s an example of how being intelligent and quick-witted can take someone a long way. Before Trump was the obvious Republican nominee in 2016, Charlie was still on the Ted Cruz train, calling Trump a political opportunist. To be fair, a lot of people didn’t quite know what to make of Trump at the time. He did come around as a MAGA guy, and shifted his messaging through his organization, Turning Point USA, towards combating socialism. He’s popular for his YouTube clips DESTROYING basement-dweller Antifa idiots (with FACTS and LOGIC). Whether it’s always been the case — or Kirk morphed over time — it seemed to many people that the only thing he wished to conserve was capitalism and the free market. For real conservatives, who wish to preserve their Christian culture, and even demographics, Charlie’s free market libertarianism just wasn’t fitting the bill. 

In November of 2019, Charlie made the ultimate slap in the face to social conservatives and traditionalists. He went on tour, and named it the Culture War. The problem is, he replaced the battle of Conservative vs. Progressive virtues with an economic argument. He promoted mass immigration, which electorally leads to socialism, and even promoted “homosexual conservatives.” 

You may recall a decades-long debate on meaning of marriage, culminating in the 2015 Supreme Court decision that ruled in favor of “same-sex marriage”. Along came the America First Patriots, sometimes called “Groypers”, to point out the hypocrisy. Their method of attack? The Q & A line. Many of these “Groypers”, were fans of online personality Nicholas J. Fuentes, who gave livestream advice on the type of questions to ask. The questions were well thought out, tough questions, mostly about immigration, but included topics on foreign policy and various social issues. What was Charlie Kirk’s response? He responded with indignation and arrogance. He even went as far as banning Nick Fuentes from his events, and slandering Patrick Casey as a White Supremacist for his involvement in a group called Identity Evropa. Identity Evropa is now defunct. Patrick now leads a group called the American Identity Movement, which seeks to fight globalism and end foreign entanglements. 

After months of slandering people like Nick Fuentes and Patrick Casey for their “hateful” views, Charlie has had a change of heart on immigration. In the video below, you can see him demanding that we “suspend all visas until we reach pre-pandemic employment levels” and “to pass Senator Tom Sutton’s Raise Act.” 

Millions of college students went into debt to get a high paying job

This is now the toughest job market in American history

Foreign nationals should NOT get preference until our students can get jobs

Pause ALL visas until we’re back to full employment

Put US citizens FIRST! pic.twitter.com/rhSLOWVEZc

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) April 10, 2020

This begs the question, why were the other’s views on immigration and demographic change based on hate? Why were the smears brought on them from the SPLC, ADL, and Antifa hacks valid? Former Congressional Candidate, and highly respected author, Pete D’Abrosca stated in a tweet, “I remember saying this almost to the letter on Tucker [Carlson] in December. I remember America’s largest news outlets calling me a ‘White Nationalist’ for it. I don’t remember Charlie Kirk or his ilk defending me.” 

The Raise Act, introduced by Senators Tom Coffin and David Perdue, seeks to cut legal immigration into the United States by nearly half by ending family chain migration. The bill does not do enough in addressing visa programs, such as H1B, that leads to foreign replacement of thousands of high skilled American workers. A proposal such as Pete D’Abrosca and Jerome Bell’s 10-year moratorium at net zero would be preferable, bringing legal immigration down to pre-1990 levels of about 250,000. 

Only time will tell if Charlie Kirk is sincere in his change of heart, or if he is just a shape shifter that secretly wants to staple visas to exchange students diplomas. Either way, one thing is evident, some apologies are in order. An apology to Pete D’Abrosca, Nick Fuentes, and Patrick Casey would go a long way in indicating his sincerity. Even reaching out to Michelle Malkin, who was much maligned for defending Nick Fuentes from the relentless mistreatment from Kirk and others from the Conservative mainstream. Perhaps, while he is up to this whole changing his tune thing, maybe he will go the extra mile and embrace a return to traditional Christian values. It is time, Charlie, not to yield the floor to Rob Smith, but answer Dave Reilly’s question, “how does anal sex help us win the culture war?” 

Charlie Kirk could not be reached for comment. 

Dan Crenshaw continued an onslaught of attacks against Nick Fuentes, Michelle Malkin, and America First patriots by labeling them “vehement racists, antisemites, & ethnic nationalists”. This is a far cry from the truth. He also went on again to call America First patriots as ‘antisemitic’ in a response to Michelle Malkin blocking him. Dan Crenshaw also supported Red Flag laws, something that also got him a lot of flack. He also criticized Donald Trump in 2016 on top of coming out in favor of same-sex marriage, all of which that has been questioned and exposed of Mr. McCain, oops, we mean Crenshaw.

It is very apparent Mr. Crenshaw has nothing but an ‘Israel First’ policy, constantly making linear conclusions between conservatism and support for Israel. Making his own opinion that if you don’t support Israel, you don’t support America. A very sick and warped view of America Politics in general, some would say traitorous. Dan Crenshaw represents the worse the establishment can offer so far, he must be unseated, exposed, and further more shammed from the conservative movement, along with all the other conservative grifters and Conservative Inc. types.

Matt is correct. They use slogans like “America first” to get conservatives to sympathize with them. But after personally dealing with them, it’s pretty obvious they are vehement racists, anti-semites & ethnic-nationalists.

Conservatives need to know the difference. https://t.co/9PHwWumnU0

— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) November 19, 2019

I guess it’s offensive to point out that conservatives are 100% different than these misguided alt-right anti-semites?

Really? pic.twitter.com/SEfMIEXQMH

— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) November 19, 2019

Dan on Red Flag Gun Laws:

It’s clear that there has been some confusion about what conservatives would support when it comes to laws that try to better protect our communities. Let’s address this directly. Watch. pic.twitter.com/TRYjPIclEm

— Rep. Dan Crenshaw (@RepDanCrenshaw) August 10, 2019

Dan’s Facebook Post from 2016 denouncing Trump’s “hateful rhetoric”: