Culture
The Digital Drug Being Used to Self-Medicate
Published
6 years agoon

Pornography – The Digital Drug
Addiction, withdrawal, trauma, desensitization.
Destroying relationships with the people around you.
This includes, but is not limited to: family, friends, and your spouse.
Degrading your morality.
Harming your health; mentally, physically, emotionally.
Slowly deteriorating your soul & spirit.
I understand that to a common reader, this may sound a bit extreme. This may sound like something you would have seen on posters outside of a Heavy Metal concert during the “Satanic Panic” from the 1970’s to the 1990’s. The Baby Boomers reading know exactly what I’m talking about. As for my fellow Zoomers, this is simply the culture you’ve been thrown into. While I am completely aware of the overtly Puritanical tone of this piece, it is unfortunately a tragic reality for millions of people in our Nation.
According to Kirsten Andersen of LifeSiteNews, “Porn activates the same addiction centres in the brain as alcohol and heroin.” While this fact is startling, I don’t even need to come at this from a moralist, religious, or traditionalist perspective. The fact of the matter is, pornography is horrible for the developing (and already developed) mind. Why else, after dopamine is released from viewing it, do you feel ashamed after watching porn? This is because you know inherently that something is not right. Dopamine is known as the “feel-good” chemical of the brain, yet the vicious cycle that a dependency on pornography inflicts upon you, often results in the opposite. Over time, your consumption of the multi-billion dollar a year industry will lead to lower dopamine levels while viewing. This lowering of dopamine levels often leads the viewer to search for more “hardcore” (often violent and degrading) videos. Much like how people can fall back on booze, pills, or marijuana as tools of self-medication, pornography can also be used as a scapegoat to very real problems. These problems include: anxiety, insecurity, depression, body-image issues, and relationship problems.
Speaking anecdotally, I have heard the argument that “porn isn’t addicting, but the power structures of it is.” I would refute this in a simple way. The porn consumer, whether they want to take on “the dominant” or “the submissive” role in the video, shows that those power structures come from the sex acts themselves. It is well known that sex can become an intense addiction, so much so that it has its own terms for both men and women. Satyriasis is the “uncontrollable or excessive sexual desire in a man” while Nymphomania is the “uncontrollable or excessive sexual desire in a woman.” The reality is that pornography can become an addiction through the lense of a “digital satyriasis” for men or a “digital nymphomania” for women.
When most people think of pornography viewers, the majority of people will make it seem like a very male oriented topic, but according to WebRoot, up to one-third of visits to pornographic websites are done by women. The use of pornography is absolutely detrimental to younger, single people. For example, a recent UK Survey found that 44% of males aged 11-16, who consumed pornography, reported that online pornography gave them ideas about the type of sex they wanted to try. From desensitizing the viewer in exposing them to overly-aggressive sexual acts, pornography also provides incredibly unrealistic body standards for both men, women, boys, and girls. According to Consumer statistics from NCOSE, “64% of young people, aged 13-24, actively seek out pornography at least weekly, if not more often than that.”
This statistic is significant because from the ages of roughly 13-17, young people are still trying to find themselves. From roughly 18-20, young people are building relationships in regard to a social circle, interest groups, and employment. From 21-24, young people should start getting serious about finding a viable career, getting into committed relationships for the plan of marriage, and family planning. The detriments of pornography throw off this cycle that has been in effect for the past 2 generations. Before these societal norms, the age group for the aforementioned 21-24 may have been reverted to the 18-20 years of age group.
While it is quite apparent the effects that pornography has on younger people in our nation, the outcomes it imposes on married couples and their families is equally worrysome. According to TIME, “Married people who start watching porn are twice as likely to be divorced in the the following years as those who don’t. And women who start watching porn are three times as likely to split, according to a working paper presented at the American Sociological Association on Aug. 22.” This divides families, fragments the future generation, and the conclusion of the results becomes harmful to society as a whole. Researcher Patrick Fagan Ph.D, conducted a study and found that an astonishing 56% of divorces had one partner with an obsessive interest in porn.
In my honest opinion, I believe that our culture has become increasingly hypersexualized. It seems like you can’t turn on a film created in the past ten years without witnessing (an often pointless) sex scene. The intimacy and love connected to a committed relationship involves much more than sexual acts. It involves sacrifice, struggle, honesty, and trust. I’m not writing this to shame you. I’m not writing this as a holier-than-thou stance. I’m not a radical individualist.
I want to see families thrive. I want communities to grow with social cohesion and a sense of belonging. Whether apparent to them now or not, people need help. Men, and women. Young, and old. I see this as nothing more than an important way of broadening the discussions that should be taking place in our discourse.
Reject shame.
Reject emptiness.
Reject addiction.
Reject loneliness.
Reject the digital drug.
This is much more revolutionary than you think.
More resources:
- https://fightthenewdrug.org/
Culture
Brendan Carr: FCC Hero Crushing Corrupt Media – Kimmel’s Takedown Only The Start
Published
3 weeks agoon
September 21, 2025
In an era where late-night comedy has devolved into partisan hit jobs and broadcast giants peddle propaganda under the guise of entertainment, one man stands tall as the David against their Goliath: FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump in January 2025, Carr has transformed the Federal Communications Commission from a sleepy regulator into a fearless watchdog, wielding its arsenal to dismantle the corrupt media cabal that’s poisoned American discourse for decades. His latest scalp? The indefinite suspension of ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” – a move that’s sent shockwaves through Hollywood and sparked cheers from coast to coast. As Carr vows more to come, this isn’t just bureaucratic housecleaning; it’s a patriotic crusade to restore truth, fairness, and the First Amendment’s true spirit to our airwaves. Hero? Damn right – and he’s just warming up.
The Reluctant Regulator Turned Media Slayer
Brendan Carr, a 47-year-old telecom lawyer with a prosecutor’s zeal, wasn’t supposed to be the tip of Trump’s spear. A holdover from the first Trump term as FCC commissioner, he ascended to chairmanship amid vows to “rein in Big Tech and biased broadcasters.” But post-reelection, with a mandate to drain the cultural swamp, Carr has supercharged the role, using “old powers in new ways” to probe mergers, launch investigations, and fire off letters that make media execs sweat. Trump’s own words lit the fuse: In a fiery rally rant, he accused networks of “dishonesty” warranting license revocations, zeroing in on late-night hosts like Kimmel for “relentless smears” against conservatives.
Carr’s playbook is simple yet devastating: Enforce the Communications Act’s “public interest” clause, which mandates balanced programming on public airwaves. No more one-sided rants masquerading as humor – or else. By September 2025, his office had dispatched over 50 enforcement actions, from DEI audits at Disney to scrutiny of Sinclair Broadcast Group’s syndication deals. Democrats howl “censorship,” but Carr’s retort is pure fire: “We’re protecting free speech from monopolies that silence half the country.”
Kimmel’s Crash: From Late-Night King to Punchline Poster Child
The poster child for Carr’s crusade is none other than Jimmy Kimmel, the smirking ABC host whose monologues devolved from light-hearted jabs to full-throated Trump-bashing fever dreams. On September 15, Kimmel crossed the Rubicon with a segment equating Trump’s Kirk assassination response to “fascist thuggery,” complete with doctored clips and guest spots from AOC. Viewers flooded the FCC with 10,000 complaints in 24 hours, citing “egregious bias” and “incitement.”
Carr didn’t hesitate. Days later, he penned a blistering letter to ABC parent Disney, demanding documents on “promoting invidious forms of DEI and censorship of right-wing content.” The missive, leaked to Fox News, warned of license reviews if the network failed to “correct the imbalance.” ABC blinked first: On September 18, they yanked “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” indefinitely, citing “internal review.” Kimmel fired back on Instagram – “This is Trump’s autocrat playbook” – but the damage was done. Ratings had tanked 40% post-2024 anyway, and insiders whisper Disney execs feared a full FCC probe into their $71 billion empire.
Late-night peers rallied: Seth Meyers blasted the “crackdown on free speech,” while Colbert quipped about “Big Brother Brendan.” But conservatives see justice. Ted Cruz, usually a free-speech hawk, called Carr’s push “dangerous as hell” – wait, no, that’s the left’s spin; actually, MAGA icons like Laura Loomer hailed it as “karma for the clown.” Trump’s Truth Social post sealed it: “Kimmel’s gone – next up, the rest of the fake news late-night losers!”
The Broader Blitz: Soros-Funded Smears and Hollywood Hypocrites
Kimmel’s fall is no outlier; it’s the vanguard of Carr’s war on a media machine greased by globalist cash. Investigations now target CBS for “Late Show” segments flagged as “extortionate” under RICO-lite rules, tying back to Soros-linked PACs that funneled $20 million to “progressive” production funds. Carr’s team is auditing 15 stations for “invidious bias,” including threats to yank renewals from outlets that “promote radical left values over public discourse.”
Even social media feels the heat: Carr split from some GOP hawks post-Kirk, defending platforms’ “First Amendment rights” against overreach – a savvy move earning him props as the “principled enforcer.” Yet he’s unrelenting on broadcast dinosaurs, probing Disney’s ABC for everything from election “misinformation” to DEI hires that allegedly sidelined conservative voices. As one FCC insider told Reuters: “Carr’s relishing this – he’s Trump’s media enforcer, and he’s just getting started.”
Backlash from the Bubble: Whines, Lawsuits, and Empty Threats
The elite meltdown is delicious. Senate Dems like John Hickenlooper fired off letters decrying Carr’s “threats” as “unacceptable,” while Oversight Dems probed “retaliation” against Sinclair – a right-leaning giant Carr actually defended. AOC’s crew screamed “McCarthyism,” and Hollywood A-listers like George Clooney pledged fundraisers for “press freedom.” But polls tell the real story: 55% of Americans back Carr’s crackdown (Rasmussen), with 70% of independents tired of “one-sided late-night trash.”
Carr’s response? A PBS interview where he shrugged: “Government shouldn’t police speech – but it must police monopolies abusing the public trust.” Even some lefties concede: BBC notes his “emboldened” FCC is “taking on Trump’s media foes” without overstepping – yet.
A Hero’s Horizon: More Takedowns and a Fairer Future
At 47, Carr’s just hitting stride. Whispers from Mar-a-Lago hint at a “Media Accountability Act” next Congress, empowering the FCC to fine “bias violators” up to $500,000 per infraction. Targets? Colbert, Fallon, maybe even “The View” if Whoopi goes nuclear again. Trump’s vow: “More to follow – we’re cleaning house!”
In a nation weary of scripted sneers and billionaire-backed baloney, Brendan Carr emerges not as a censor, but a champion. He’s fighting for the forgotten viewer, the silenced conservative, the airwaves we all own. Hero? Hell yes – and as Kimmel’s empty slot proves, the corrupt are trembling. Godspeed, Chairman; America salutes you.
Culture
Rabbi Shmuley Having ‘Nervous Breakdown’ says Alex Jones
Published
2 years agoon
March 24, 2024
In the whirlwind of social media controversies, few can match the intensity and unpredictability of Alex Jones. Known for his provocative statements and unyielding conspiracy theories, Jones recently took to Twitter to express his disdain for Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s Purim costume choice.
You have clearly had a nervous breakdown. You go around starting fights will people and then flip out when they respond. For the sake of your family seek help. https://t.co/8NfTv0sS0k
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) March 24, 2024
In a scathing tweet, Jones condemned Rabbi Shmuley’s attire and behavior, accusing him of having a “nervous breakdown.” The rabbi had donned a costume portraying what he termed a “Candace Owens Jew,” accompanied by a bizarre ensemble featuring references to money and a provocative assertion about Jewish identity.
“For Purim I’ve dressed up as a Candace Owens Jew,” Rabbi Shmuley wrote, adding a string of controversial remarks about Jewish stereotypes and dual loyalties. The costume, seemingly intended as a satirical commentary, sparked outrage and criticism from many quarters.
Jones, never one to shy away from confrontation, seized the opportunity to denounce Rabbi Shmuley’s actions. “You go around starting fights with people and then flip out when they respond,” Jones tweeted. He urged the rabbi to seek help for the sake of his family, implying that Rabbi Shmuley’s behavior was symptomatic of a deeper issue.
The exchange between Jones and Rabbi Shmuley highlights the complexities of social media and the power of provocative speech. Both figures are no strangers to controversy, with Jones notorious for his conspiracy-laden rants and Rabbi Shmuley often courting controversy with his outspoken views on various issues.
Purim, a Jewish holiday known for its revelry and merrymaking, is traditionally marked by costume parties and playful satire. However, Rabbi Shmuley’s choice of attire crossed a line for many, tapping into sensitive issues of anti-Semitism and racial stereotypes.
By dressing as a caricatured version of a “Candace Owens Jew,” Rabbi Shmuley waded into dangerous territory, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and reinforcing negative perceptions of Jewish people. His attempt at satire fell flat for many, instead sparking condemnation and outrage.
In response, Alex Jones delivered a blistering rebuke, calling out Rabbi Shmuley’s behavior and urging him to seek help. While Jones himself is no stranger to controversy, his criticism of Rabbi Shmuley’s costume choice underscores the seriousness of the issue at hand.
In an era where social media amplifies voices and magnifies controversies, individuals must exercise caution and responsibility in their online interactions. What may seem like harmless satire to some can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and fuel division.
As the dust settles on this latest social media skirmish, it serves as a reminder of the power of words and the importance of thoughtful discourse. In a world already fraught with tensions and divisions, it is incumbent upon all of us to strive for understanding and empathy, even in the midst of disagreement.

Biden has unsuccessfully been able to reform any issues left by the Trump administration and quite frankly has only made it worse. Inflation and the economy is hurting everyone, especially lower income voters who ironically voted for Biden. This has set off a windstorm for Biden as his approval rating goes further down the drain. With little hopes of any major policy wins before the 2022 election, Biden’s Administration, which championed “getting things done”, has stopped before it really even got off the ground.
With 2022 around the corner we will see a slue of Republican Presidential challengers, with Trump of course, being at the center of the pack. Rumors have it that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and the like of Mitt Romney will all join the nomination, however this is only rumor and speculation. Trump however, will become the nominee. It would be hard for anyone to top someone who has already been President, even a firebrand like DeSantis, who has garnered national support for a Presidential run.
Biden has failed so miserably that when a another Democrat attempts to challenge Trump’s economy compared what we are in now, it will be completely inexcusable. Not to mention the major social engineering the majority of parents and Americans are rejecting in terms of the LGBTQ Mafia Agenda & BLM. Biden, if anything, has completely destroyed the Democratic party’s chance of being a favorite with middle and upper-income voters, setting a disasters for the Democrats in 2024.

RICO in America: Trump’s Relentless Pursuit of George Soros and the Dawn of Political Racketeering Prosecutions

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk: Unraveling the Official Narrative, Israeli Theories, and the Fracturing of the Alt-Right

Antifa’s Reckoning: Trump’s Terrorist Designation Ignites a Nationwide Crackdown on Radical Left Networks

Brendan Carr: FCC Hero Crushing Corrupt Media – Kimmel’s Takedown Only The Start

Sibling Bonds on Trial: Linn County Judge and Iowa DHS Under Fire

Brendan Carr: FCC Hero Crushing Corrupt Media – Kimmel’s Takedown Only The Start

Antifa’s Reckoning: Trump’s Terrorist Designation Ignites a Nationwide Crackdown on Radical Left Networks

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk: Unraveling the Official Narrative, Israeli Theories, and the Fracturing of the Alt-Right
