Connect with us

Culture

Trust In News Hitting Lows During Trump Presidency

Published

on

(Via AP News)

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — When truck driver Chris Gromek wants to know what’s really going on in Washington, he scans the internet and satellite radio. He no longer flips TV channels because networks such as Fox News and MSNBC deliver conflicting accounts tainted by politics, he says.

“Where is the truth?” asks the 47-year-old North Carolina resident.

Answering that question accurately is a cornerstone of any functioning democracy, according to none other than Thomas Jefferson. But a year into Donald Trump’s fact-bending, media-bashing presidency, Americans are increasingly confused about who can be trusted to tell them reliably what their government and their commander in chief are doing.

Interviews across the polarized country as well as polling from Trump’s first year suggest people seek out various outlets of information, including Trump’s Twitter account, and trust none in particular.

Many say that practice is a new, Trump-era phenomenon in their lives as the president and the media he denigrates as “fake news” fight to be seen as the more credible source.

“It has made me take every story with a large grain, a block of salt,” said Lori Viars, a Christian conservative activist in Lebanon, Ohio, who gets her news from Fox and CNN. “Not just from liberal sources. I’ve seen conservative ‘fake news.’”

Democrat Kathy Tibbits of Tahlequah, Oklahoma, reads lots of news sources as she tries to assess the accuracy of what Trump is reported to have said.

“I kind of think the whole frontier has changed,” said the 60-year-old lawyer and artist. “My degree is in political science, and they never gave us a class on such fiasco politics.”

Though Trump’s habit of warping facts has had an impact, it’s not just him.

Widely shared falsehoods have snagged the attention of world leaders such as Pope Francis and former President Barack Obama. Last year, false conspiracy theories led a North Carolina man to bring a gun into a pizza parlor in the nation’s capital, convinced that the restaurant was concealing a child prostitution ring. Just last week, after the publication of an unflattering book about Trump’s presidency, a tweet claiming that he is addicted to a TV show about gorillas went viral and prompted its apparent author to clarify that it was a joke.

Trump has done his part to blur the lines between real and not.

During the campaign, he made a practice of singling out for ridicule reporters covering his raucous rallies. As president, he regularly complains about his news coverage and has attacked news outlets and journalists as “failing” and “fake news.” He’s repeatedly called reporters “the enemy of the people” and recently renewed calls to make it easier to sue for defamation.

About 2 in 3 American adults say fabricated news stories cause a great deal of confusion about the basic facts of current affairs, according to a Pew Research Center report last month. The survey found that Republicans and Democrats are about equally likely to say that “fake news” leaves Americans deeply confused about current events. Despite the concern, more than 8 in 10 feel very or somewhat confident that they can recognize news that is fabricated, the survey found.

Victoria Steel, 50, of Cheyenne, Wyoming, said it’s important for people to invest time in finding reputable media sources or even friends to get the most information they can.

“You’re probably not going to get enough information out of sound bites, and you’re certainly not going to get it in a tweet,” said Steel, who says she voted for Democrat Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Two-thirds of Americans get at least some of their news from social media, Pew found.

“I think part of the problem is that now people are getting too much information and it confuses them and they don’t know how to decipher the true and the fake,” said Trent Lott, a former Senate Republican leader from Mississippi who’s worked in Washington for nearly half a century. He isn’t fond of Trump’s Twitter habit, but also says he sees bias in the coverage of Washington by the mainstream media.

There’s been no love for the media for decades. The percentage expressing a great deal of confidence in the press has eroded from a high of 28 percent in 1976 to just 8 percent in 2016, according the General Social Survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago.

“Trump didn’t invent this. He didn’t cause people to start feeling this way. He’s tapping into a vein that already existed,” said Gary Abernathy, publisher and editor of the Times-Gazette of Hillsboro, Ohio, one of the few daily papers that endorsed Trump. People, he added, “are nodding their heads right away because that’s how they’ve felt.”

Nicco Mele, director of the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard, views Trump as a symptom of long-term trends. “Now, can he accelerate them and make them worse? Almost certainly.”

When Trump labels something “fake news,” ″I just have started assuming … whatever he’s talking about must be true,” said 46-year-old Joseph Murray of Mustang, Oklahoma, a registered independent. “I feel like that attitude didn’t start until he took office.”

Trump tends to inflate the significance of what he’s done. He claims his tax cuts are the biggest in history, his accomplishments surpass those of all previous presidents, and his election victory was a “landslide.” None is true.

He still insists there were millions of illegal votes cast in the 2016 election, even though there’s no such evidence.

Even on matters existential, Trump makes things up.

Taunted on Twitter by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Trump responded Jan. 3 that his own nuclear button “is a much bigger and powerful one than his, and my Button works!” There is no such physical button.

Trump often bypasses the vast information-gathering apparatus that reports to him in favor of getting his reality from TV, or sometimes just his gut. That has led him to conclude wrongly that a rare riot in Sweden over a drug crime was instead linked to refugee extremism. He also falsely claimed that Obama tapped his phones at Trump Tower in the campaign.

“I’m a very instinctual person, but my instinct turns out to be right,” he told Time magazine. Besides, “I’m quoting highly respected people from highly respected television networks.”

Kellman reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Dan Sewell in Cincinnati, Claudia Lauer in Dallas, Bob Moen in Cheyenne, Wyoming, and Calvin Woodward in Washington contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture

Brendan Carr: FCC Hero Crushing Corrupt Media – Kimmel’s Takedown Only The Start

Published

on

In an era where late-night comedy has devolved into partisan hit jobs and broadcast giants peddle propaganda under the guise of entertainment, one man stands tall as the David against their Goliath: FCC Chairman Brendan Carr. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump in January 2025, Carr has transformed the Federal Communications Commission from a sleepy regulator into a fearless watchdog, wielding its arsenal to dismantle the corrupt media cabal that’s poisoned American discourse for decades. His latest scalp? The indefinite suspension of ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” – a move that’s sent shockwaves through Hollywood and sparked cheers from coast to coast. As Carr vows more to come, this isn’t just bureaucratic housecleaning; it’s a patriotic crusade to restore truth, fairness, and the First Amendment’s true spirit to our airwaves. Hero? Damn right – and he’s just warming up.

The Reluctant Regulator Turned Media Slayer

Brendan Carr, a 47-year-old telecom lawyer with a prosecutor’s zeal, wasn’t supposed to be the tip of Trump’s spear. A holdover from the first Trump term as FCC commissioner, he ascended to chairmanship amid vows to “rein in Big Tech and biased broadcasters.” But post-reelection, with a mandate to drain the cultural swamp, Carr has supercharged the role, using “old powers in new ways” to probe mergers, launch investigations, and fire off letters that make media execs sweat. Trump’s own words lit the fuse: In a fiery rally rant, he accused networks of “dishonesty” warranting license revocations, zeroing in on late-night hosts like Kimmel for “relentless smears” against conservatives.

Carr’s playbook is simple yet devastating: Enforce the Communications Act’s “public interest” clause, which mandates balanced programming on public airwaves. No more one-sided rants masquerading as humor – or else. By September 2025, his office had dispatched over 50 enforcement actions, from DEI audits at Disney to scrutiny of Sinclair Broadcast Group’s syndication deals. Democrats howl “censorship,” but Carr’s retort is pure fire: “We’re protecting free speech from monopolies that silence half the country.”

Kimmel’s Crash: From Late-Night King to Punchline Poster Child

The poster child for Carr’s crusade is none other than Jimmy Kimmel, the smirking ABC host whose monologues devolved from light-hearted jabs to full-throated Trump-bashing fever dreams. On September 15, Kimmel crossed the Rubicon with a segment equating Trump’s Kirk assassination response to “fascist thuggery,” complete with doctored clips and guest spots from AOC. Viewers flooded the FCC with 10,000 complaints in 24 hours, citing “egregious bias” and “incitement.”

Carr didn’t hesitate. Days later, he penned a blistering letter to ABC parent Disney, demanding documents on “promoting invidious forms of DEI and censorship of right-wing content.” The missive, leaked to Fox News, warned of license reviews if the network failed to “correct the imbalance.” ABC blinked first: On September 18, they yanked “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” indefinitely, citing “internal review.” Kimmel fired back on Instagram – “This is Trump’s autocrat playbook” – but the damage was done. Ratings had tanked 40% post-2024 anyway, and insiders whisper Disney execs feared a full FCC probe into their $71 billion empire.

Late-night peers rallied: Seth Meyers blasted the “crackdown on free speech,” while Colbert quipped about “Big Brother Brendan.” But conservatives see justice. Ted Cruz, usually a free-speech hawk, called Carr’s push “dangerous as hell” – wait, no, that’s the left’s spin; actually, MAGA icons like Laura Loomer hailed it as “karma for the clown.” Trump’s Truth Social post sealed it: “Kimmel’s gone – next up, the rest of the fake news late-night losers!”

The Broader Blitz: Soros-Funded Smears and Hollywood Hypocrites

Kimmel’s fall is no outlier; it’s the vanguard of Carr’s war on a media machine greased by globalist cash. Investigations now target CBS for “Late Show” segments flagged as “extortionate” under RICO-lite rules, tying back to Soros-linked PACs that funneled $20 million to “progressive” production funds. Carr’s team is auditing 15 stations for “invidious bias,” including threats to yank renewals from outlets that “promote radical left values over public discourse.”

Even social media feels the heat: Carr split from some GOP hawks post-Kirk, defending platforms’ “First Amendment rights” against overreach – a savvy move earning him props as the “principled enforcer.” Yet he’s unrelenting on broadcast dinosaurs, probing Disney’s ABC for everything from election “misinformation” to DEI hires that allegedly sidelined conservative voices. As one FCC insider told Reuters: “Carr’s relishing this – he’s Trump’s media enforcer, and he’s just getting started.”

Backlash from the Bubble: Whines, Lawsuits, and Empty Threats

The elite meltdown is delicious. Senate Dems like John Hickenlooper fired off letters decrying Carr’s “threats” as “unacceptable,” while Oversight Dems probed “retaliation” against Sinclair – a right-leaning giant Carr actually defended. AOC’s crew screamed “McCarthyism,” and Hollywood A-listers like George Clooney pledged fundraisers for “press freedom.” But polls tell the real story: 55% of Americans back Carr’s crackdown (Rasmussen), with 70% of independents tired of “one-sided late-night trash.”

Carr’s response? A PBS interview where he shrugged: “Government shouldn’t police speech – but it must police monopolies abusing the public trust.” Even some lefties concede: BBC notes his “emboldened” FCC is “taking on Trump’s media foes” without overstepping – yet.

A Hero’s Horizon: More Takedowns and a Fairer Future

At 47, Carr’s just hitting stride. Whispers from Mar-a-Lago hint at a “Media Accountability Act” next Congress, empowering the FCC to fine “bias violators” up to $500,000 per infraction. Targets? Colbert, Fallon, maybe even “The View” if Whoopi goes nuclear again. Trump’s vow: “More to follow – we’re cleaning house!”

In a nation weary of scripted sneers and billionaire-backed baloney, Brendan Carr emerges not as a censor, but a champion. He’s fighting for the forgotten viewer, the silenced conservative, the airwaves we all own. Hero? Hell yes – and as Kimmel’s empty slot proves, the corrupt are trembling. Godspeed, Chairman; America salutes you.

Continue Reading

Culture

Rabbi Shmuley Having ‘Nervous Breakdown’ says Alex Jones

Published

on

In the whirlwind of social media controversies, few can match the intensity and unpredictability of Alex Jones. Known for his provocative statements and unyielding conspiracy theories, Jones recently took to Twitter to express his disdain for Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s Purim costume choice.

In a scathing tweet, Jones condemned Rabbi Shmuley’s attire and behavior, accusing him of having a “nervous breakdown.” The rabbi had donned a costume portraying what he termed a “Candace Owens Jew,” accompanied by a bizarre ensemble featuring references to money and a provocative assertion about Jewish identity.

“For Purim I’ve dressed up as a Candace Owens Jew,” Rabbi Shmuley wrote, adding a string of controversial remarks about Jewish stereotypes and dual loyalties. The costume, seemingly intended as a satirical commentary, sparked outrage and criticism from many quarters.

Jones, never one to shy away from confrontation, seized the opportunity to denounce Rabbi Shmuley’s actions. “You go around starting fights with people and then flip out when they respond,” Jones tweeted. He urged the rabbi to seek help for the sake of his family, implying that Rabbi Shmuley’s behavior was symptomatic of a deeper issue.

The exchange between Jones and Rabbi Shmuley highlights the complexities of social media and the power of provocative speech. Both figures are no strangers to controversy, with Jones notorious for his conspiracy-laden rants and Rabbi Shmuley often courting controversy with his outspoken views on various issues.

Purim, a Jewish holiday known for its revelry and merrymaking, is traditionally marked by costume parties and playful satire. However, Rabbi Shmuley’s choice of attire crossed a line for many, tapping into sensitive issues of anti-Semitism and racial stereotypes.

By dressing as a caricatured version of a “Candace Owens Jew,” Rabbi Shmuley waded into dangerous territory, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and reinforcing negative perceptions of Jewish people. His attempt at satire fell flat for many, instead sparking condemnation and outrage.

In response, Alex Jones delivered a blistering rebuke, calling out Rabbi Shmuley’s behavior and urging him to seek help. While Jones himself is no stranger to controversy, his criticism of Rabbi Shmuley’s costume choice underscores the seriousness of the issue at hand.

In an era where social media amplifies voices and magnifies controversies, individuals must exercise caution and responsibility in their online interactions. What may seem like harmless satire to some can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and fuel division.

As the dust settles on this latest social media skirmish, it serves as a reminder of the power of words and the importance of thoughtful discourse. In a world already fraught with tensions and divisions, it is incumbent upon all of us to strive for understanding and empathy, even in the midst of disagreement.

Continue Reading

Culture

Trump Is Poised To Take 2024 By Storm

Published

on

Biden has unsuccessfully been able to reform any issues left by the Trump administration and quite frankly has only made it worse. Inflation and the economy is hurting everyone, especially lower income voters who ironically voted for Biden. This has set off a windstorm for Biden as his approval rating goes further down the drain. With little hopes of any major policy wins before the 2022 election, Biden’s Administration, which championed “getting things done”, has stopped before it really even got off the ground.

With 2022 around the corner we will see a slue of Republican Presidential challengers, with Trump of course, being at the center of the pack. Rumors have it that Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, and the like of Mitt Romney will all join the nomination, however this is only rumor and speculation. Trump however, will become the nominee. It would be hard for anyone to top someone who has already been President, even a firebrand like DeSantis, who has garnered  national support for a Presidential run.

Biden has failed so miserably that when a another Democrat attempts to challenge Trump’s economy compared what we are in now, it will be completely inexcusable. Not to mention the major social engineering the majority of parents and Americans are rejecting in terms of the LGBTQ Mafia Agenda & BLM. Biden, if anything, has completely destroyed the Democratic party’s chance of being a favorite with middle and upper-income voters, setting a disasters for the Democrats in 2024.

Continue Reading

Trending

Donate to Populist Wire

*Note: Every donation is greatly appreciated, regardless of the amount.