Connect with us

Politics

German Economists Admit That Tax Overhaul Is A Huge In For The U.S. Economy

Published

on

(Via NewsWars)

German economists have admitted that the Republican tax overhaul is a huge win for the U.S. economy, having the potential to siphon investment and jobs from Europe.

Christoph Spengel, chairman of the corporate tax department at the University of Mannheim, explained in a recent press release that the move to cut the corporate tax rates in the U.S. is a game changer.

“This tax reform in the US isn’t just going to stoke tax competition between the United States and Europe; competition between EU Member States for US investment is also going to intensify and Germany is going to lose out,” said Spengel, who is also a research associate at the Center for European Economic Research (ZEW).

ZEW and a group of tax experts released a study in mid-December detailing how the massive tax cut would substantially benefit the United States in international tax competition as rates are now closer to the European average (20.9%).

“The tax competition will have a new dimension,” Spengel says.

The idea that Germany would lose out to the new incentives provided by the recently passed tax bill is also shared by Clemens Fuest, head of the German Ifo economic think tank, who said, “Investments and jobs will migrate to the US.”

According to reporting by Handelsblatt Global, the potential capital influx from Germany to the U.S. could be as high as $42.29 billion, or 39 billion euros.

It seems as if worry is spreading across Europe over America’s new competitive position in the global economy.

Finance ministers of Europe’s five biggest economies, including France and Italy, wrote a letter to US Treasury Secretary Stephen Mnuchin in clear panic over tax cuts.

“The United States is Europe’s single most important trade and investment partner,” the finance ministers wrote. “It is important that the U.S. government’s rights over domestic tax policy be exercised in a way that adheres with international obligations to which it has signed-up. The inclusion of certain less conventional international tax provisions could contravene the US’s double taxation treaties and may risk having a major distortive impact on international trade.”

A similar letter was sent to Mnuchin by the European Commission’s four most senior economic officials which made many of the same points.

So, while the U.S. mainstream media and Democrats rallied against the tax plan with a laser focus on potential corporate profits, economic officials and tax experts in Europe were giving the overhaul the greatest endorsement with their panic over the America first move.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Rob Sand Must Be Audited Along with LGI

Published

on

Rob Sand won the Iowa governor’s race as the state’s auditor. That dual role demands immediate scrutiny of his own office and of LGI, the family business run by his wife, Christine Lauridsen Sand. Taxpayers have a right to know whether any public contracts, grants, or favorable treatment flowed between the auditor’s office and the company while he held statewide power. Iowa does not get a free pass on conflicts simply because the winner is a Democrat.

America First means accountability for officials who oversee public money. Sand built his career on auditing others. The same standard now applies to him and to LGI. Any overlap in finances, vendor relationships, or use of state resources must be examined by independent review before he takes the governor’s office. Working families in Iowa already face water-quality issues, budget pressures, and education concerns. They should not also wonder whether family business interests influenced decisions made in the auditor’s office.

An audit of Sand’s tenure and of LGI is the minimum required for confidence in the transition. If irregularities appear, they must be referred for further investigation. Sovereignty and basic fairness require that the next governor faces the same transparency he once claimed to enforce. Iowa voters deserve nothing less before he is sworn in.

Continue Reading

Politics

2028: America First Dark Horse Must Rise

Published

on

The 2026 midterms cleared the field. Democrats took Congress after voters punished high gas prices and the Iran war. Establishment heirs now carry that baggage. JD Vance’s odds slipped overnight. Marco Rubio remains tied to the same foreign-policy circle that produced the conflict. Neither can lead a clean America First recovery. The candidate must be anyone but Vance or Rubio.

That dark horse must run on sealed borders, an end to forever wars, energy independence, and trade that puts American workers first. Traditional values and biological reality in policy cannot be treated as optional. The midterms showed the cost of foreign entanglements and elite priorities. Working families want their government focused on home, not distant conflicts or cultural experiments. Only a figure free of prior establishment ties—and free of Vance or Rubio—can make that case without apology.

The next two years will decide whether the movement stays pure or dilutes into another round of managed decline. A dark horse who rejects globalist deals, defends sovereignty, and speaks plainly to the base can consolidate the realignment before 2028. The country does not need another caretaker from the current circle. It needs someone new who will finish what America First started.

Continue Reading

Politics

Democrats Gave Ground on Their Wackiest Issues to “Win”

Published

on

The midterm results show Democrats winning by dialing back the cultural extremes that defined their last several cycles. In Texas, James Talarico walked back earlier progressive positions on transgender issues to make himself viable in a state that rejected those policies for decades. Elsewhere, candidates who once embraced open borders, defund-the-police rhetoric, and identity-first messaging softened or ignored those planks and focused on costs, the Iran war, and gasoline prices. The public had already rejected the full agenda; the party simply stopped advertising the parts voters hated most.

America First voters never accepted boys in girls’ sports, men in women’s shelters, or sanctuary policies that prioritize non-citizens over citizens. Polling and prior elections already showed those positions as losers outside the coastal core. By muting them in red and purple districts while hammering inflation and foreign wars, Democrats could appeal to working-class Hispanics, independents, and some traditional Democrats who had shifted right. The strategy worked for one night because the economic pain was acute and the alternative was a party tied to high gas prices. It does not mean the underlying cultural preferences of the country changed.

Once in power, the same figures and progressive caucuses will push the old agenda again—Medicare for All, ending enforcement, and cultural mandates. The temporary ground they gave was tactical, not principled. Working Americans still want secure borders, biological reality in policy, and government that puts citizens first. The midterms proved the left cannot win by leading with its most extreme ideas. They also proved those ideas remain the party’s destination once the ballots are counted.

Continue Reading

Trending

Donate to Populist Wire

*Note: Every donation is greatly appreciated, regardless of the amount.